...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Comparison of efficacy and safety of conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by the transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal procedure
【24h】

Comparison of efficacy and safety of conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by the transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal procedure

机译:腹腔镜与腹膜外常规腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的疗效和安全性比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Worldwide, prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common malignancy in males. We undertook a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a transperitoneal (TLRP) approach, versus that of an extraperitoneal (ELRP) approach, for treatment of localized PCa. A comprehensive literature search retrieved 14 publications, with a total of 1715 patients. Meta-analysis of these studies showed that an ELRP approach was associated with a significantly shorter postoperative catheterization time (MD: 1.99; 95% CI: 0.52 to 3.54; P?=?0.008), less blood transfusion rate (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.03 to 4.06; P?=?0.04), shorter intestinal function recovery time (MD: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.09; P
机译:在全球范围内,前列腺癌(PCa)是男性中第二常见的恶性肿瘤。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较常规腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与腹膜外(ELRP)方法相比,腹腔镜(TLRP)方法与局部腹腔镜前列腺癌的疗效和安全性。全面的文献检索检索了14种出版物,总共1715例患者。对这些研究的荟萃分析显示,ELRP方法可显着缩短术后置管时间(MD:1.99; 95%CI:0.52至3.54; P <= 0.008),输血率更低(OR:2.05; 95) %CI:1.03至4.06;Pα=≤0.04),更短的肠功能恢复时间(MD:0.08; 95%CI:0.52至1.09; P

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号