...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Identifying, avoiding and dealing with convergence failures in maximum-likelihood estimation of the psychometric function.
【24h】

Identifying, avoiding and dealing with convergence failures in maximum-likelihood estimation of the psychometric function.

机译:在心理测度函数的最大似然估计中识别,避免和处理收敛失败。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Maximum-likelihood estimation of the parameters of a psychometric function typically occurs through an iterative search for the maximum value in the likelihood function defined across the parameter space. This procedure is subject to failure. First, iterative search procedures may find a local, not global, maximum in the likelihood function. This issue can be adequately avoided by performing a brute-force search through a sufficiently fine-grained grid across parameter space and using the highest likelihood in the grid as a seed for a subsequent iterative search procedure. However, the procedure also fails when the likelihood function does not contain a maximum. This is the case when either a step function or a constant function is associated with a higher likelihood than the model function can attain with finite parameter values. In such cases iterative search procedures may erroneously report having successfully converged on a maximum in the likelihood function. The parameter estimates that result from such false convergences are largely arbitrary. As such, the estimates of parameters, their standard errors and confidence intervals, whose derivation included such false convergences will be systematically inaccurate. Here I describe a method by which false convergences can be reliably detected. Using simulations, I systematically investigate how stimulus placement, number of trials, parameters estimated, and task (2AFC, 4AFC, etc) affect the probability that the likelihood function will not contain a maximum at finite parameter values. Importantly, simulations indicate that as long as a real maximum exists in the likelihood functions of both the data as well as bootstrap simulations, standard errors derived by a standard bootstrap procedure are essentially unbiased. This result holds across a wide variety of stimulus placement strategies, including adaptive placement strategies, pattern of free parameters, and tasks.
机译:心理测量函数参数的最大似然估计通常是通过迭代搜索跨参数空间定义的似然函数中的最大值来进行的。此过程可能会失败。首先,迭代搜索过程可能会在似然函数中找到局部最大值,而不是全局最大值。通过对整个跨参数空间的足够细粒度的网格执行蛮力搜索,并将网格中的最高似然性用作后续迭代搜索过程的种子,可以充分避免此问题。但是,当似然函数不包含最大值时,该过程也会失败。当阶跃函数或常数函数的关联性高于模型函数使用有限参数值可获得的关联性时,就是这种情况。在这种情况下,迭代搜索过程可能会错误地报告已成功收敛于似然函数的最大值。由这种虚假收敛产生的参数估计在很大程度上是任意的。这样,参数的推导,其标准误差和置信区间(其推导包括此类错误收敛)将在系统上不准确。在这里,我描述了一种可以可靠地检测虚假收敛的方法。通过模拟,我系统地研究了刺激位置,试验次数,估计的参数和任务(2AFC,4AFC等)如何影响似然函数在有限参数值下不包含最大值的可能性。重要的是,仿真表明,只要数据的似然函数以及自举仿真都存在真实的最大值,由标准自举程序得出的标准误差就基本上是无偏的。该结果适用于各种各样的刺激放置策略,包括自适应放置策略,自由参数的模式和任务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号