首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Spatiotopic updating of visual feature information
【24h】

Spatiotopic updating of visual feature information

机译:视觉特征信息的空间更新

获取原文
           

摘要

Saccades shift the retina with high-speed motion. In order to compensate for the sudden displacement, the visuomotor system needs to combine saccade-related information and visual metrics. Many neurons in oculomotor but also in visual areas shift their receptive field shortly before the execution of a saccade (Duhamel, Colby, & Goldberg, 1992; Nakamura & Colby, 2002). These shifts supposedly enable the binding of information from before and after the saccade. It is a matter of current debate whether these shifts are merely location based (i.e., involve remapping of abstract spatial coordinates) or also comprise information about visual features. We have recently presented fMRI evidence for a feature-based remapping mechanism in visual areas V3, V4, and VO (Zimmermann, Weidner, Abdollahi, & Fink, 2016). In particular, we found fMRI adaptation in cortical regions representing a stimulus' retinotopic as well as its spatiotopic position. Here, we asked whether spatiotopic adaptation exists independently from retinotopic adaptation and which type of information is behaviorally more relevant after saccade execution. We first adapted at the saccade target location only and found a spatiotopic tilt aftereffect. Then, we simultaneously adapted both the fixation and the saccade target location but with opposite tilt orientations. As a result, adaptation from the fixation location was carried retinotopically to the saccade target position. The opposite tilt orientation at the retinotopic location altered the effects induced by spatiotopic adaptation. More precisely, it cancelled out spatiotopic adaptation at the saccade target location. We conclude that retinotopic and spatiotopic visual adaptation are independent effects.
机译:扫视运动使视网膜高速移动。为了补偿突然的位移,视觉运动系统需要结合扫视相关信息和视觉指标。动眼运动以及视觉区域中的许多神经元在进行扫视之前不久会转移其感受力(Duhamel,Colby和Goldberg,1992; Nakamura和Colby,2002)。据推测,这些变化使扫视之前和之后的信息绑定成为可能。当前的争论是这些移动是仅基于位置(即,涉及对抽象空间坐标的重新映射)还是还包括关于视觉特征的信息。我们最近提供了功能磁共振成像证据,表明视觉区域V3,V4和VO具有基于特征的重映射机制(Zimmermann,Weidner,Abdollahi和Fink,2016年)。特别是,我们发现fMRI在代表刺激的视网膜原位及其空间位置的皮质区域中的适应性。在这里,我们问了是否进行视听适应与视黄醛适应是否独立,以及扫视执行后哪种信息在行为上更相关。我们首先仅在扫视目标位置进行了调整,并发现了空间倾斜后效应。然后,我们同时调整了固定位置和扫视目标位置,但倾斜方向相反。结果,从固定位置的适应在视网膜后进行到扫视目标位置。视网膜位置处相反的倾斜方向改变了空间适应引起的效果。更确切地说,它消除了扫视目标位置的空间适应性。我们得出的结论是,视网膜视位和空间视位的视觉适应是独立的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号