...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Stochastic noise decreases the accuracy of distractor rejection in dual- compared to single-target search
【24h】

Stochastic noise decreases the accuracy of distractor rejection in dual- compared to single-target search

机译:与单目标搜索相比,随机噪声降低了双目标中干扰物排除的准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

Simultaneous search for two targets is slower and less accurate than independent searches for the same two targets. Within the SDT framework, this can be attributed to the division of attentional resources across multiple stimulus sets during search (Palmer, Ames & Lindsey, 1993). The current study used one or two cues to elicit single- and dual-target searches in single-fixation and free view displays. Landholt's Cs were used to group display objects into leftward and rightward facing sets. The angle of separation between the target and distractors in each set was adjusted to observers' 80% correct thresholds during a single-target pre-test at a set size of 1. In Experiment 1, the accuracy of "yes-no" judgements was compared on single- and dual-target searches at set-sizes of 1, 2 and 4. The data revealed a reduction in accuracy consistent with an increase in decision-noise in dual- compared to single-target searches. In Experiment 2, the accuracy and latency of observers' initial fixations in single- and dual-target searches were compared. Fixations on single-target searches were highly selective towards the target. The probability of fixating distractors facing the same way as the target was also significantly higher than for those facing the opposite direction. On dual-target searches, fixations were significantly less accurate then on single-target searches. The probability of fixating leftward and rightward facing distractors was also comparable, indicating competition for selection from both sets of objects during dual-target search. These results suggest the dual-target cost reflects a decrease in the accuracy of distractor rejection when objects in the display are compared against multiple representations in visual working memory.
机译:与同时搜索两个目标相比,同时搜索两个目标速度较慢且准确性较差。在SDT框架内,这可以归因于搜索过程中注意力资源在多个刺激集之间的划分(Palmer,Ames和Lindsey,1993)。当前的研究使用一个或两个提示在单注视和自由视图显示中引发单目标和双目标搜索。 Landholt的C用于将显示对象分组为向左和向右的集合。在单目标预测试期间,在设定大小1的情况下,将每组目标与干扰物之间的分离角度调整为观察者的80%正确阈值。在实验1中,“是”判断的准确性为在设置大小分别为1、2和4的单目标和双目标搜索中进行了比较。数据显示,与单目标搜索相比,双目标搜索的准确性下降与决策噪声的增加一致。在实验2中,比较了在单目标和双目标搜索中观察者初始注视的准确性和潜伏期。对单目标搜索的关注对目标具有高度的选择性。固定与目标方向相同的撑开器的可能性也大大高于那些朝向相反方向的撑开器。在双目标搜索中,注视的准确性明显低于单目标搜索。固定向左和向右的干扰物的可能性也相当,这表明在双目标搜索期间竞争从两组对象中进行选择的竞争。这些结果表明,将目标对象与视觉工作内存中的多种表示形式进行比较时,双重目标成本反映了干扰项拒绝准确性的降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号