首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Visual search in natural scenes: a double-dissociation paradigm for comparing observer models
【24h】

Visual search in natural scenes: a double-dissociation paradigm for comparing observer models

机译:自然场景中的视觉搜索:用于比较观察者模型的双重分解范例

获取原文
       

摘要

Search is a fundamental and ubiquitous visual behavior. Here, we aim to model fixation search under naturalistic conditions and develop a strong test for comparing observer models. Previous work has identified the entropy limit minimization (ELM) observer as an optimal fixation selection model.1 The ELM observer selects fixations that maximally reduce uncertainty about the location of the target. However, this rule is optimal only if the detectability of the target falls off in the same way for every possible fixation (e.g., as in a uniform noise field). Most natural scenes do not satisfy this assumption; they are highly non-stationary. By combining empirical measurements of target detectability with a simple mathematical analysis, we arrive at a generalized ELM rule (nELM) that is optimal for non-stationary backgrounds. Then, we used the nELM rule to generate search time predictions for Gaussian blob targets embedded in hundreds of natural images. We also simulated a maximum a posteriori (MAP) observer, which is a common model in the search literature. To examine which model is more similar to human performance, we developed a double-dissociation search paradigm, selecting pairs of target locations where the nELM and the MAP observer made opposite predictions regarding search speed. By comparing the difference in human search times for each pair with the different model predictions, we can determine which model predictions are more similar to human behavior. Preliminary data from two observers show that human observers behave more like the nELM than the MAP. We conclude that the nELM observer is a useful normative model of fixation search and appears to be a good model of human search in natural scenes. Additionally, the proposed double-dissociation paradigm provides as a strong test for comparing competing models. 1Najemnik, J. & Geisler W.S. (2009) Vis. Res., 49, 1286-1294.
机译:搜索是一种基本且普遍存在的视觉行为。在这里,我们旨在对自然条件下的注视搜索进行建模,并开发出强大的测试来比较观察者模型。先前的工作已将熵极限最小化(ELM)观察器确定为最佳注视选择模型。1ELM观察器选择的注视镜能最大程度地减少目标位置的不确定性。但是,只有对于每种可能的注视,目标的可检测性以相同的方式下降时(例如,在均匀噪声场中),此规则才是最佳的。大多数自然场景都不满足该假设。它们非常不稳定。通过将目标可检测性的经验测量结果与简单的数学分析相结合,我们得出了一种适用于非平稳背景的通用ELM规则(nELM)。然后,我们使用nELM规则为嵌入数百个自然图像中的高斯斑点目标生成搜索时间预测。我们还模拟了最大后验(MAP)观察者,这是搜索文献中的常见模型。为了检查哪种模型与人类绩效更相似,我们开发了双解搜索范例,选择了nELM和MAP观察者对搜索速度做出相反预测的目标位置对。通过将每对人类搜索时间的差异与不同的模型预测进行比较,我们可以确定哪些模型预测与人类行为更相似。来自两个观察者的初步数据表明,人类观察者的行为更像是nELM,而不是MAP。我们得出的结论是,nELM观察者是注视搜索的有用规范模型,并且似乎是自然场景中人类搜索的良好模型。此外,所提出的双解范式为比较竞争模型提供了有力的检验。 1 Najemnik,J.&Geisler W.S. (2009年)。 Res。,49,1286-1294。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号