...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >When scenes and words collide: Irrelevant background scenes modulate neural responses during lexical decisions.
【24h】

When scenes and words collide: Irrelevant background scenes modulate neural responses during lexical decisions.

机译:当场景和单词碰撞时:不相关的背景场景会在词汇决策过程中调节神经反应。

获取原文

摘要

Usually, linguistic operations and visual-perceptual operations are studied separately in domain-specific experimental paradigms. However, there has been evidence that language and image processing interact behaviorally in a purely linguistic task (V?μ & Wolfe, VSS 2014). Here we test whether brain responses during lexical decisions are modulated by an irrelevant, visual background scene, via analysis of EEG signals. Participants were presented with a background scene and a location cue before a string of letters appeared at the pre-cued scene location. The sole task was to decide whether the letter string formed a word or non-word. Words could either be congruent with the scene (a??SOAPa?? on sink), semantically incongruent (a??EGGa?? on sink), syntactically incongruent (a??SOAPa?? on towel rack a?? i.e., semantically congruent but it in a wrong relative location), or double-incongruent (a??EGGa?? on towel rack). We found that words that were semantically incongruent with respect to the background scene triggered a negative deflection compared to the consistent words about 400ms after word onset. In the language domain, this N400 response is known to signal difficulties in the semantic integration of a word with its sentence context. Interestingly, this incongruity effect between scene and words was more pronounced on left- rather than right-hemispheric electrodes, possibly due to the involvement of linguistic processes. Semantically congruent words presented in improbable scene locations, on the other hand, did not significantly affect brain responses. Thus, the syntactic placement of a word on an irrelevant background scene did not modulate neural responses to the extent that semantically incongruent words did. We conclude that a brief visual scene preview a?? even if task-irrelevant a?? automatically interacts with linguistic operations on at least the semantic processing level. Therefore, language and visual scene processing may share common parsing mechanisms that are efficiently integrated to function as a unitary whole.
机译:通常,在特定领域的实验范式中分别研究语言操作和视觉操作。但是,有证据表明,语言和图像处理在纯语言任务中会在行为上交互(V?μ&Wolfe,VSS 2014)。在这里,我们通过对EEG信号的分析来测试词汇决策过程中的大脑反应是否受到无关的视觉背景场景的调节。在预先提示的场景位置出现一串字母之前,向参与者展示了背景场景和位置提示。唯一的任务是确定字母字符串是单词还是非单词。单词可能与场景(在接收器上为a ?? SOAPa ??)一致,在语义上不一致(在接收器上为a ?? EGGa ??),在语法上不一致(在毛巾架a ??上为a ?? SOAPa ??),即语义上一致一致,但相对位置错误),或双重不一致(在毛巾架上为a ?? EGGa ??)。我们发现,与单词出现后约400ms的一致单词相比,与背景场景在语义上不一致的单词会引起负偏斜。在语言领域,这种N400响应已知表示单词在其句子上下文中的语义集成困难。有趣的是,场景和单词之间的这种不一致效应在左半球而不是右半球电极上更为明显,这可能是由于语言过程的参与所致。另一方面,在不太可能出现的场景位置出现的语义一致词并不会显着影响大脑反应。因此,一个词在不相关的背景场景上的句法位置并没有像语义上不一致的词那样调节神经反应。我们得出的结论是,对视觉场景进行了简短的预览?即使与任务无关的一个?至少在语义处理级别自动与语言操作交互。因此,语言和视觉场景处理可以共享通用的解析机制,这些解析机制可以有效地集成为一个整体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号