首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Zero-dimensional noise: The best mask you never saw
【24h】

Zero-dimensional noise: The best mask you never saw

机译:零维杂讯:您从未见过的最佳遮罩

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Abstract: Abstract?? Thetransmission of weak signals through the visual system is limited by internal noise. Its level can be estimated by adding external noise, which increases the variance within the detecting mechanism, causing masking. But experiments with white noise fail to meet three predictions: (a) noise has too small an influence on the slope of the psychometric function, (b) masking occurs even when the noise sample is identical in each two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) interval, and (c) double-pass consistency is too low. We show that much of the energy of 2D white noise masks extends well beyond the pass-band of plausible detecting mechanisms and that this suppresses signal activity. These problems are avoided by restricting the external noise energy to the target mechanisms by introducing a pedestal with a mean contrast of 0% and independent contrast jitter in each 2AFC interval (termed zero-dimensional [0D] noise). We compared the jitter condition to masking from 2D white noise in double-pass masking and (novel) contrast matching experiments. Zero-dimensional noise produced the strongest masking, greatest double-pass consistency, and no suppression of perceived contrast, consistent with a noisy ideal observer. Deviations from this behavior for 2D white noise were explained by cross-channel suppression with no need to appeal to induced internal noise or uncertainty. We conclude that (a) results from previous experiments using white pixel noise should be re-evaluated and (b) 0D noise provides a cleaner method for investigating internal variability than pixel noise. Ironically then, the best external noise stimulus does not look noisy.
机译:摘要摘要:摘要?通过视觉系统的微弱信号传输受到内部噪声的限制。可以通过添加外部噪声来估计其电平,这会增加检测机制内的差异,从而导致掩蔽。但是使用白噪声的实验无法满足以下三个预测:(a)噪声对心理测验函数的斜率影响太小;(b)即使在每个两个备选强制选择(2AFC )间隔,以及(c)两次通过的一致性太低。我们表明,二维白噪声蒙版的大部分能量都远远超出了合理的检测机制的通带范围,并且这抑制了信号活动。通过在每个2AFC间隔中引入平均对比度为0%且具有独立对比度抖动的基座(称为零维[0D]噪声),将外部噪声能量限制在目标机构中,可以避免这些问题。我们在两次通过遮罩和(新颖)对比度匹配实验中,比较了抖动条件和2D白噪声的遮罩。零维噪声产生了最强的遮罩,最大的双通道一致性,并且没有抑制感知到的对比度,这与嘈杂的理想观察者一致。跨通道抑制可以解释这种针对2D白噪声的行为的偏差,而无需引起内部噪声或不确定性。我们得出的结论是,(a)应该重新评估使用白色像素噪声的先前实验的结果,并且(b)0D噪声比像素噪声提供了一种更干净的方法来研究内部可变性。具有讽刺意味的是,最好的外部噪声刺激看起来并不嘈杂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号