...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Chromatic (Red/Green) and Luminance Contrast Sensitivity in Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twin Infants
【24h】

Chromatic (Red/Green) and Luminance Contrast Sensitivity in Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twin Infants

机译:单卵和双卵双胞胎婴儿的色度(红色/绿色)和亮度对比敏感度

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To determine the extent to which contrast sensitivity (CS) development is governed by genetic mechanisms vs. environment, we compared CS between pairs of twin infants and pairs of unrelated infants. If genetics have a strong influence on CS, Monozygotic (Mz) twin siblings should be more similar (and more strongly correlated) than Dizygotic (Dz) twin siblings, and both Mz and Dz twins should show greater correlations than unrelated infant pairs. By contrast, if genetics have little influence, correlations should be the same for Dz and Mz twins. In this latter scenario, if both Mz and Dz twins show greater correlations than unrelated infant pairs, this suggests a role of shared environment. The current study measured Luminance (light/dark) and Chromatic (red/green) CS to assess sensitivity of the Magnocellular and Parvocellular pathways, respectively. Methods: Ten and 26 pairs of Mz and Dz twin pairs were tested (mean age = 4.5?±1.5 mos). Zygosity was assessed using a questionnaire and cheek swab kits. Luminance and Chromatic CS were obtained for sinusoidal gratings using forced-choice preferential looking (a??200 trials per infant; 0.27 cycles/degree; 4.2 Hz). Results: Multiple regression was conducted on 100 runs of random Twin-1/Twin-2 orderings. Results indicated that the CS of one twin predicted 35-40% of the variance (p 0.0001) in the CS of the other twin, while controlling for postnatal age, gestational length, and gender. Simulations with randomly-matched twins suggest these findings are not due to chance. Discussion: Results suggest shared environment and/or genes influence both Luminance and Chromatic CS. With more subjects, we will address whether Luminance vs. Chromatic CS is more or less affected by shared genes/environment. Once we have enough data to compare Mz vs. Dz twins, we can ask which factor, genes or environment, is more influential using structural equation modeling (Neale et al, 2002).
机译:目的:为了确定对比敏感度(CS)的发展受遗传机制与环境的控制程度,我们比较了双胞胎婴儿和非亲缘婴儿对之间的CS。如果遗传学对CS有很强的影响力,则单卵双胞胎(Mz)的双胞胎应该比双卵双胞胎(Dz)的双胞胎更相似(并且相关性更强),并且Mz和Dz双胞胎都应显示出比不相关的婴儿对更大的相关性。相反,如果遗传学影响很小,则Dz和Mz双胞胎的相关性应该相同。在后一种情况下,如果Mz和Dz双胞胎都显示出比不相关的婴儿对更大的相关性,则表明共享环境的作用。当前的研究测量了亮度(亮/暗)和色(红/绿)CS,分别评估了巨细胞和小细胞途径的敏感性。方法:测试十对和26对Mz和Dz对(平均年龄= 4.5?±1.5 mos)。使用问卷调查和脸颊拭子工具包评估接合性。使用强制选择优先外观获得正弦光栅的亮度和色度CS(每名婴儿进行a ?? 200次试验; 0.27个周期/度; 4.2 Hz)。结果:对100次随机Twin-1 / Twin-2排序进行多元回归。结果表明,一个双胞胎的CS预测了另一对双胞胎的CS差异的35-40%(p <0.0001),同时控制了出生年龄,孕期和性别。用随机匹配​​的双胞胎进行的模拟表明,这些发现并非偶然。讨论:结果表明,共享的环境和/或基因会影响亮度和色度CS。在更多的主题下,我们将探讨亮度与色度CS或多或少受共享基因/环境的影响。一旦我们有了足够的数据来比较Mz和Dz双胞胎,就可以使用结构方程模型询问哪个因素,基因或环境更具影响力(Neale等,2002)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号