首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Comparing two mechanisms for the perception of binocular motion in depth
【24h】

Comparing two mechanisms for the perception of binocular motion in depth

机译:比较深度感知双眼运动的两种机制

获取原文
           

摘要

It has been suggested that binocular motion in depth may be perceived via mechanisms sensitive to changing binocular disparity, or sensitive to inter-ocular velocity differences. I will start by describing how each source of visual information can be isolated. I will then review some of the evidence suggesting the use of each mechanism, and suggest how a signal-in-noise approach can be used to compare their relative utility. We have recently measured the ability to discriminate motion in depth of a population of naive observers. I will discuss how the natural variation between performance of different individuals can be used to provide support for the existence of two independent binocular motion in depth mechanisms. We have also found that not all observers appear to be sensitive to both mechanisms. In general, visual systems appear to rely mostly on the mechanism sensitive to changing binocular disparity, but perception of motion in depth is augmented by the presence of a (usually) less sensitive mechanism that uses interocular velocity differences. Occasionally, we find observers with the opposite pattern of sensitivity, suggesting that if one mechanism is compromised, the other may compensate.
机译:已经提出,可以通过对改变双眼视差敏感或对眼间速度差异敏感的机制来感知双眼的深度运动。我将首先描述如何隔离每种视觉信息源。然后,我将回顾一些建议使用每种机制的证据,并提出如何使用信噪比方法比较其相对效用。我们最近测量了区分天真的观察者深度运动的能力。我将讨论如何利用不同个体的表现之间的自然差异为深度机制中两个独立的双眼运动的存在提供支持。我们还发现,并非所有观察者似乎都对这两种机制敏感。通常,视觉系统似乎主要依赖于对双眼视差变化敏感的机制,但是由于存在(通常)使用眼动速度差的较不敏感的机制而增强了对深度运动的感知。有时,我们发现观察者具有相反的敏感性模式,这表明如果一种机制受到损害,另一种机制可能会补偿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号