...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Steering and Cognition: Does attentional load impede or facilitate steering around a bend?
【24h】

Steering and Cognition: Does attentional load impede or facilitate steering around a bend?

机译:转向和认知:注意负荷是否会阻碍或促进弯道转向?

获取原文

摘要

Steering around bends is a common task performed daily by millions of people, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain largely uncharted. It has been proposed that steering can be performed without recourse to conscious a??cognitivea?? control (Gibson, 1958), however, much simpler locomotor-related tasks, such as judging one's heading, have been shown to be affected by concurrent attentional tasks (Wann et al, 2000). Here we examine whether an attentional task placed at the point of fixation influences steering. Twelve participants were asked to steer around bending roadways (3 m wide, radius = 60 m to 35 m) at a constant speed (13.8 m/s). Participants fixated a sign positioned at 1 of 4 different eccentricities relative to screen and body midline (?±30 deg, ?±20 deg). The sign either showed a cross (no attentional load), or numbers/arrows (attentional load). The attentional loads were similar to Wann et al. (2000): i) the a??Numbera?? condition presented a sequence of two numbers, after the trial participants judged whether they were ascending or descending; ii) the a??Arrowa?? condition presented a sequence of two arrows that pointed in different directions, after the trial participants judged whether the second arrow was oriented clockwise or anticlockwise compared to the first. In all conditions participants' steering drifted in the direction of the fixation points (consistent with Robertshaw & Wilkie, 2008), but no significant effect was found in steering bias for the three different attentional load conditions. However, in the a??Numbera?? and a??Arrowa?? conditions steering was significantly less variable than the no-load condition. We suggest that this reduced variability reflects visuomotor a??lockinga?? due to reduced responsiveness to visual-feedback. As such we conclude that steering can be influenced by cognitive processing, with one potential cost being reduced flexibility in steering when there is a concurrent attentional load.
机译:弯道转向是每天数百万人执行的一项常见任务,但其潜在的神经机制仍未阐明。已经提出,无需依靠有意识的“认知”就可以进行操纵。控制(Gibson,1958),然而,与运动相关的许多简单任务(例如判断一个人的方向)已经显示出会同时受到注意任务的影响(Wann等,2000)。在这里,我们检查放置在注视点上的注意力任务是否会影响转向。 12名参与者被要求以恒定的速度(13.8 m / s)围绕弯曲的道路(3 m宽,半径= 60 m至35 m)进行转向。参与者固定了一个标志,该标志相对于屏幕和身体中线位于4个不同的偏心率之一(θ±30度,θ±20度)。该标志显示为叉号(无注意负载)或数字/箭头(注意有负载)。注意负荷与Wann等类似。 (2000):i)a ?? Numbera ??在试验参与者判断他们是上升还是下降之后,病情呈现出两个数字的序列。 ii)a ?? Arrowa ??在试验参与者判断第二个箭头相对于第一个箭头是顺时针还是逆时针定向之后,情况呈现了两个指向不同方向的箭头。在所有情况下,参与者的转向都朝着固定点的方向漂移(与Robertshaw&Wilkie,2008年一致),但在三种不同的注意负荷条件下,转向偏向都没有发现显着影响。但是,在a ?? Numbera ??中还有一个?Arrowa?与空载相比,转向的可变性要小得多。我们认为这种降低的变异性反映了视觉运动的“锁定”。由于降低了对视觉反馈的响应能力。因此,我们得出结论,转向会受到认知过程的影响,其中一个潜在的成本是当同时存在注意力负荷时,转向的灵活性降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号