...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Attenuation of Haemodynamic Parameters in Response to Pneumoperitoneum during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Infusions of Propofol and Dexmedetomidine UC01-UC04
【24h】

Attenuation of Haemodynamic Parameters in Response to Pneumoperitoneum during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Infusions of Propofol and Dexmedetomidine UC01-UC04

机译:腹腔镜胆囊切除术中响应气腹的血流动力学参数的衰减:丙泊酚和右美托咪定UC01-UC04输注的随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Effective control of sympathetic response to pneumoperitoneum is vital to avoid morbidity in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries. This control must be achieved without any side effects of the drugs being used as well as ensuring a raid recovery from anaesthesia in order to maximise operation theatre utility.Aim: To study the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in attenuating the haemodynamic response to pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (using only the maintenance dose) with that of propofol and compare time to extubation, haemodynamics on extubation, sedation score after extubation and any incidence of side effects between the two study drug.Materials and Methods: Sixty American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) I and II patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy between age of 20-60 years were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each: Group D to receive dexmedetomidine in dose of 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/hr titrated as per clinical response and Group P to receive propofol in dose of 25-75 μg/kg/min (1.5-4.5 mg/kg/hr) titrated as per clinical response after standard anaesthetic induction. Data recording was done for changes in haemodynamic parameters, time to extubation and post extubation sedation score. Statistical analysis was done using students-test and Chi-square test with p-value of0.05). Time to extubation was similar in both the groups (p-value >0.05). Haemodynamics on extubation was better controlled in dexmedetomidine group (p-value <0.05) while the sedation score was better in propofol group (p-value <0.05). Mean dose of dexmedetomidine and propofol used were 0.504±0.09 μg/kg/hr and 3.19±0.7 mg/kg/hr respectively.Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine in a dose of 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/hr provides a stable haemodynamics without any side effects in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
机译:简介:有效控制气腹交感反应对于避免腹腔镜手术患者的发病至关重要。必须在没有使用任何药物副作用的情况下实现这一控制,并确保从麻醉中突袭恢复,以最大程度地提高手术室的实用性。目的:研究右美托咪定在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中减轻对气腹的血流动力学反应的有效性(仅使用维持剂量和丙泊酚的维持剂量,比较拔管时间,拔管后的血流动力学,拔管后的镇静分数以及两种研究药物之间的副作用发生率。材料和方法:美国六十名麻醉医师学会(ASA)I和将年龄在20至60岁之间的接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的II病人随机分为两组,每组30例:D组接受根据临床反应滴定的0.2-0.7μg/ kg / hr剂量的右美托咪定,P组接受丙泊酚标准麻醉诱导后根据临床反应滴定25-75μg/ kg / min(1.5-4.5 mg / kg / hr)的剂量。进行数据记录以记录血流动力学参数,拔管时间和拔管后镇静分数的变化。使用学生检验和卡方检验进行统计分析,p值为0.05)。两组拔管时间相似(p值> 0.05)。右美托咪定组拔管时的血流动力学得到更好的控制(p值<0.05),而丙泊酚组的镇静分数更好(p值<0.05)。右美托咪定和丙泊酚的平均剂量分别为0.504±0.09μg/ kg / hr和3.19±0.7 mg / kg / hr。结论:右美托咪定的剂量为0.2-0.7μg/ kg / hr可提供稳定的血流动力学,没有任何副作用在接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号