首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Comparison of Plasma Levels of Renin, Vasopressin and Atrial Natriuretic Peptide in Hypertensive Amlodipine Induced Pedal Oedema, Non-Oedema and Cilnidipine Treated Patients FC05-FC08
【24h】

Comparison of Plasma Levels of Renin, Vasopressin and Atrial Natriuretic Peptide in Hypertensive Amlodipine Induced Pedal Oedema, Non-Oedema and Cilnidipine Treated Patients FC05-FC08

机译:高血压氨氯地平诱发的踏板水肿,非水肿和西尼地平治疗的患者FC05-FC08血浆肾素,加压素和心钠素水平的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Amlodipine is a third generation dihydropyridine group of calcium channel blocker and having an excellent antihypertensive profile. Pedal Oedema (PE) is the major drawback of amlodipine therapy and the incidence of Amlodipine Induced Pedal Oedema (AIPE) has been found significantly high. Several neurohumoral factors influence the incidence of oedema.Aim: We aimed to compare the plasma levels of renin, vasopressin and atrial natriuretic peptide in hypertensive AIPE, non-oedema and cilnidipine treated patients.Materials and Methods: The present prospective, interventional study was conducted on 104 mild to moderate hypertensive patients (52 patients in each group), after due consideration of eligibility criteria. Plasma Renin (PR), Vasopressin (VAS), and the Atrial Natriuretic Peptide (ANP) was estimated by ELISA test and compared between the AIPE, Amlodipine Treated Non-Oedema (ATNE) in Phase I, and AIPE and Cilnidipine Treated (CT) Groups in Phase II.Results: The clinical and demographic parameters were matched. PR was significantly high in AIPE group than the ATNE, and it was significantly reduced after one month follow up with the substitution of cilnidipine. The median (IQR) value of PR was 4.87 (3.58, 6.63), 3.50 (1.44, 5.47) and 2.66 (1.02, 5.66) ng/ml in AIPE, ATNE, CT group respectively. VAS was significantly high in AIPE group than ATNE, and it significantly reduced after one month follow up with CT group. The median (IQR) value of vasopressin was 6.78 (2.55, 9.16), 2.58 (1.61, 5.73) and 2.50 (1.23, 5.00) ng/ml in AIPE, ATNE and CT groups respectively. There was no significant difference seen in plasma ANP levels between the groups. The p-value was <0.05 which is statistically significant.Conclusion: The AIPE may not be volume overload or fluid retention; it may be due to persistent raise in adrenergic activity followed chronic amlodipine therapy. Cilnidipine relatively suppresses the sympathetic activity, and completely resolves the AIPE by significantly reducing PR and VAS levels. ANP did not show a difference between groups. Cilnidipine is the suitable alternative antihypertensive drug for AIPE patients.
机译:简介:氨氯地平是钙通道阻滞剂的第三代二氢吡啶基,具有出色的降压作用。踏板水肿(PE)是氨氯地平治疗的主要缺点,发现氨氯地平诱发的踏板水肿(AIPE)的发生率显着较高。几种神经体液因素会影响水肿的发生。目的:我们旨在比较高血压AIPE,非水肿和西尼地平治疗患者的血浆肾素,血管加压素和心钠素水平。材料与方法:本项前瞻性,干预性研究已经进行。在适当考虑入选标准后,对104例轻至中度高血压患者(每组52例)进行了研究。通过ELISA试验评估血浆肾素(PR),血管加压素(VAS)和心钠素(ANP),并在第一阶段AIPE,氨氯地平治疗的非水肿(ATNE)以及AIPE和西尼地平治疗(CT)之间进行比较II期各组。结果:临床和人口统计学参数均匹配。 AIPE组的PR显着高于ATNE,在替换西尼地平一个月后,PR显着降低。 AIPE,ATNE和CT组的PR的中位数(IQR)值分别为4.87(3.58,6.63),3.50(1.44、5.47)和2.66(1.02,5.66)ng / ml。 AIPE组的VAS显着高于ATNE,CT组随访1个月后VAS显着降低。在AIPE,ATNE和CT组中,加压素的中位(IQR)值分别为6.78(2.55,9.16),2.58(1.61、5.73)和2.50(1.23,5.00)ng / ml。两组之间血浆ANP水平无明显差异。 p值<0.05,具有统计学意义。结论:AIPE可能不是容量超负荷或液体retention留。这可能是由于慢性氨氯地平治疗后肾上腺素能活动持续增加所致。西尼地平相对抑制交感神经活动,并通过显着降低PR和VAS水平完全解决AIPE。 ANP没有显示组之间的差异。西尼地平是AIPE患者的合适替代性降压药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号