首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Comparison of Retropupillary Iris-clawIntraocular Lens Implantation and Transscleral Suture Fixation of an Intraocular Lens for Aphakic Eyes
【24h】

Comparison of Retropupillary Iris-clawIntraocular Lens Implantation and Transscleral Suture Fixation of an Intraocular Lens for Aphakic Eyes

机译:无晶状体眼的后瞳孔虹膜爪人工晶状体植入和巩膜缝线固定

获取原文
       

摘要

Iris-claw intraocular lens and scleral-fixation of intraocular lens are the main options for the correction of aphakia with inadequate capsular support. It is still unclear which one is the most appropriate for the management of aphakic eyes without sufficient capsular support.Aim: We compared early post-operative visual function and complications after retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens (IOL) implantation and transscleral sutured IOL fixation for the treatment of aphakia in eyes without adequate capsular support.Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 36 aphakic eyes without capsular support. Nineteen eyes underwent posterior chamber implantation of the iris-claw lens (iris-claw group) and 17 eyes underwent transscleral suture fixation of an IOL (transscleral fixation group). Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Intraocular Pressure (IOP), operating time, and complications were compared between the groups. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at one day, one week, one month, and three months post-operatively.Results: BCVA was better in the iris-claw than in the transscleral fixation group at post-operative day one (p=0.01), but the groups did not differ significantly at one week, one month, or three months post-operatively (p>0.05). The mean operating time in the iris-claw group was significantly shorter than that in the transscleral fixation group (p<0.001). The post-operative complications in the transscleral fixation group included elevated IOP (17.65%), hyphema (5.88%), and retinal detachment (5.88%). Complications in the iris-claw group included pupil distortion (21.05%), increased IOP (5.26%), spontaneous dislocation (5.26%), and cystoid macular oedema (5.26%).Conclusion: Secondary retropupillary implantation of an iris-claw lens allows earlier visual recovery and requires a shorter operating time than does transscleral suture fixation of an IOL. In the early post-operative period, both surgical procedures are efficient and relatively safe for treating aphakic eyes without a stable lens bag.
机译:虹膜爪人工晶状体和人工晶状体巩膜固定术是在囊膜支持不足的情况下纠正无晶状体的主要选择。尚不清楚哪一种最适合无晶状体眼的无囊囊支持的治疗。目的:我们比较了瞳孔后虹膜-爪状人工晶状体(IOL)植入和巩膜缝合后的早期术后视觉功能和并发症人工晶状体固定术可在没有足够的囊膜支持的情况下治疗无晶状体眼。材料和方法:这项前瞻性研究包括36例无囊膜支持的无晶状体眼。 19眼行虹膜-羊角膜片后房植入术(虹膜-爪组),17眼行人工晶状体缝线缝合法固定(人工巩膜固定组)。比较两组的最佳矫正视力(BCVA),眼压(IOP),手术时间和并发症。对患者进行术前,术后1天,1周,1个月和3个月的评估。结果:虹膜爪的BCVA优于术后第1天的巩膜固定组( p = 0.01),但两组在术后1周,1个月或3个月时无显着差异(p> 0.05)。虹膜爪组的平均手术时间明显短于巩膜固定组(p <0.001)。经巩膜固定组的术后并发症包括眼压升高(17.65%),前房积血(5.88%)和视网膜脱离(5.88%)。虹膜爪组的并发症包括瞳孔畸形(21.05%),眼压升高(5.26%),自发性脱位(5.26%)和黄斑囊样水肿(5.26%)。结论:虹膜爪的二次后瞳孔植入爪状晶状体比人工晶状体的巩膜缝合固定术更早恢复视觉,并且需要更短的手术时间。在术后早期,两种手术方法对于无晶状体眼的稳定手术都有效且相对安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号