首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia with Sequential Combined Spinal Epidural Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery UC17-UC20
【24h】

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia with Sequential Combined Spinal Epidural Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery UC17-UC20

机译:单侧脊柱麻醉与序贯联合硬膜外麻醉对下肢骨科手术UC17-UC20的疗效和安全性比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Orthopaedic anaesthesia plan requires customi-zation as per patient?s need for safe outcome. Sequential Combined Spinal Epidural Anaesthesia (Sequential CSEA) and Unilateral Single Shot Spinal anaesthesia (Unilateral SA), both have advantages over conventional spinal anaesthesia that they provide longer lasting block with less hypotension.Aim: To compare safety and efficacy of unilateral spinal anaesthesia with sequential combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for lower limb orthopaedic surgery .Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted on sixty ASA I-III patients aged 18- 65 years undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgeries of approximately two hours duration. Sequential CSE group received spinal with 5 mg of 0.5 hyperbaric bupivacaine followed by incremental epidural top up of 2 cc of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine to achieve and maintain T10 level. In unilateral SA group, unilateral spinal anaesthesia was given with 10 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Haemodynamic parameter, anaesthesia readiness time and block characteristics were recorded and results were analysed using unpaired Student's t-test.Results: There was no failure of block, surgical anaesthesia with T10 sensory level and bromage score three motor block was achieved by all patients in both groups. Anaesthesia readiness time was less in unilateral SA (p<0.001) Incidences of hypotension (p-0.0059) and mean ephedrine dose were significantly less in sequential CSEA. Five patients of unilateral SA required supplementation with general anaesthesia.Conclusion: Thus, our study concludes that unilateral SA is a cost-effective and rapidly performed anaesthetic technique. Unilateral SA with 10 mg bupivacaine and sequential CSEA with 5 mg spinal and incremental epidural top up, both provide good quality sensory and motor block for lower limb orthopaedic surgery but sequential CSEA provides significantly more stable haemodynamics with feasibility to prolong block. Thus sequential CSEA should be preferred over unilateral SA in high risk patients especially for major lower limb orthopaedic surgeries.
机译:简介:骨科麻醉计划需要根据患者对安全结果的需要进行定制。序贯联合硬膜外麻醉(Sequential CSEA)和单侧单发脊髓麻醉(Unilateral SA)相对于常规脊髓麻醉均具有持续时间长,低血压低的优势。目的:比较单侧脊髓麻醉和序贯性麻醉的安全性和有效性材料和方法:这项前瞻性随机研究针对60例年龄在18-65岁的ASA I-III患者,他们接受了大约两小时的下肢整形外科手术。连续CSE组接受5 mg 0.5 mg高压布比卡因的脊柱治疗,然后硬膜外加注2 cc 0.5%的同量异丁酸布比卡因,以达到并维持T10水平。在单侧SA组中,单侧脊髓麻醉采用0.5 mg高压布比卡因10 mg。记录血流动力学参数,麻醉准备时间和阻滞特性,并使用不成对的Student t检验分析结果。结果:所有患者均未发生阻滞失败,T10感觉水平和麻痹评分的手术麻醉均达到了三个运动阻滞组。单侧SA的麻醉准备时间更少(p <0.001),连续CSEA的低血压发生率(p-0.0059)和麻黄碱平均剂量显着减少。 5例单侧SA患者需要补充全身麻醉。结论:因此,我们的研究得出结论,单侧SA是一种具有成本效益且可以快速实施的麻醉技术。单侧SA含10 mg布比卡因和序贯CSEA配以5 mg脊柱和增量硬膜外充血,均能为下肢骨科手术提供良好的感觉和运动阻滞,但序贯CSEA可提供更稳定的血液动力学,并具有延长阻滞的可行性。因此,在高风险患者中,尤其是对于下肢大骨科手术,顺序CSEA优于单侧SA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号