...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >A Study of Assessing Errors and Completeness of Research Application Forms Submitted to Instituitional Ethics Committee (IEC) of a Tertiary Care Hospital
【24h】

A Study of Assessing Errors and Completeness of Research Application Forms Submitted to Instituitional Ethics Committee (IEC) of a Tertiary Care Hospital

机译:三级医院机构伦理委员会(IEC)提交的评估研究申请表的错误和完整性的研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Application form of research work is an essential requirement which is required to be submitted along with the research proposal to the Ethics Committee (EC).Aim: To check the completeness and to find the errors in application forms submitted to the EC of a tertiary care hospital.Materials and Methods: The application forms of research projects submitted to the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Government Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India from January 2014 to June 2015 were analysed for completeness and errors, with respect to the following - type of study, information about study investigators, sample size, study participants, title of the studies, signatures of all investigators, regulatory approval, recruitment procedure, compensation to study participants, informed consent process, information about sponsor, declaration of conflict of interest, plans for storage and maintenance of data, patient information sheet, informed consent forms and study related documents.Results: Total 100 application forms were analysed. Among them, 98 were academic and 2 were industrial studies. Majority of academic studies were of basic science type. In 63.26% studies, type of study was not mentioned in title. Age group of subjects was not mentioned in 8.16% application forms. In 34.6% informed consent, benefits of the study were not mentioned. Signature of investigators/co-investigators/Head of the Department was missing in 3.06% cases.Conclusion: Our study recommends that the efficiency and speed of review will increase if investigator will increase vigilance regarding filling of application forms. Regular meetings will be helpful to solve the problems related to content of application forms. The uniformity in functioning of EC can be achieved if common application form for all ECs is there.
机译:简介:研究工作的申请表是一项基本要求,必须与研究计划书一起提交给道德委员会(EC)。目的:检查完整性并查找提交给EC的EC的申请表中的错误。材料和方法:分析了2014年1月至2015年6月提交给印度古吉拉特邦巴夫那加尔政府医学院的机构审查委员会(IRB)的研究项目申请表的完整性和错误,以下-研究类型,有关研究调查者的信息,样本量,研究参与者,研究标题,所有研究者的签名,监管批准,招募程序,研究参与者的补偿,知情同意程序,有关保荐人的信息,冲突声明兴趣,数据存储和维护计划,患者信息表,知情同意书以及与研究相关的文档结果:共分析了100份申请表。其中,有98名学者,2名工业研究者。大多数学术研究属于基础科学类型。在63.26%的研究中,标题未提及研究类型。在8.16%的申请表中未提及受试者的年龄组。在34.6%的知情同意书中,未提及研究的益处。在3.06%的案件中,调查人员/共同调查人员/部门负责人的签名缺失。结论:我们的研究建议,如果调查人员提高对填写申请表格的警惕性,则审查的效率和速度将提高。定期会议将有助于解决与申请表内容有关的问题。如果存在所有EC的通用申请表,则可以实现EC的功能统一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号