...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Molecular and Culture-Based Assessment of the Microbial Diversity of Diabetic Chronic Foot Wounds and Contralateral Skin Sites
【24h】

Molecular and Culture-Based Assessment of the Microbial Diversity of Diabetic Chronic Foot Wounds and Contralateral Skin Sites

机译:基于分子和文化的糖尿病慢性足创和对侧皮肤部位微生物多样性评估

获取原文

摘要

Wound debridement samples and contralateral (healthy) skin swabs acquired from 26 patients attending a specialist foot clinic were analyzed by differential isolation and eubacterium-specific PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) in conjunction with DNA sequencing. Thirteen of 26 wounds harbored pathogens according to culture analyses, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common (13/13). Candida (1/13), pseudomonas (1/13), and streptococcus (7/13) were less prevalent. Contralateral skin was associated with comparatively low densities of bacteria, and overt pathogens were not detected. According to DGGE analyses, all wounds contained significantly greater eubacterial diversity than contralateral skin (P < 0.05), although no significant difference in total eubacterial diversity was detected between wounds from which known pathogens had been isolated and those that were putatively uninfected. DGGE amplicons with homology to Staphylococcus sp. (8/13) and S. aureus (2/13) were detected in putatively infected wound samples, while Staphylococcus sp. amplicons were detected in 11/13 noninfected wounds; S. aureus was not detected in these samples. While a majority of skin-derived DGGE consortial fingerprints could be differentiated from wound profiles through principal component analysis (PCA), a large minority could not. Furthermore, wounds from which pathogens had been isolated could not be distinguished from putatively uninfected wounds on this basis. In conclusion, while chronic wounds generally harbored greater eubacterial diversity than healthy skin, the isolation of known pathogens was not associated with qualitatively distinct consortial profiles or otherwise altered diversity. The data generated support the utility of both culture and DGGE for the microbial characterization of chronic wounds.
机译:通过差异分离和真细菌特异性PCR-变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)结合DNA测序,分析了从26位就诊于专科足部诊所的患者中获取的伤口清创样品和对侧(健康)皮肤拭子。根据培养分析,在26个伤口中有13个带有病原体,最常见的是金黄色葡萄球菌(13/13)。念珠菌(1/13),假单胞菌(1/13)和链球菌(7/13)的发病率较低。对侧皮肤与细菌密度相对较低相关,并且未检测到明显的病原体。根据DGGE分析,所有伤口均比对侧皮肤具有更大的真细菌多样性( P <0.05),尽管在分离出已知病原体的伤口与那些病原体之间没有发现总真细菌多样性的显着差异。被推定未感染。与葡萄球菌sp。同源的DGGE扩增子。 (8/13)和金黄色葡萄球菌(2/13)在推定感染的伤口样本中被检测到,而葡萄球菌(Staphylococcus sp。)在11/13个未感染的伤口中检测到扩增子;在这些样品中未检测到金黄色葡萄球菌。尽管可以通过主成分分析(PCA)将大多数皮肤来源的DGGE财团指纹与伤口轮廓区分开,但少数人则无法。此外,在此基础上,无法从中分离出病原体的伤口与假定未感染的伤口区分开。总之,虽然慢性伤口通常比健康皮肤具有更大的细菌多样性,但是已知病原体的分离与定性上不同的联合体谱或其他改变的多样性无关。产生的数据支持培养物和DGGE在慢性伤口的微生物表征中的实用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号