首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Three Different FDA-Approved Plasma HIV-1 RNA Assay Platforms Confirms the Virologic Failure Endpoint of 200 Copies per Milliliter Despite Improved Assay Sensitivity
【24h】

Comparison of Three Different FDA-Approved Plasma HIV-1 RNA Assay Platforms Confirms the Virologic Failure Endpoint of 200 Copies per Milliliter Despite Improved Assay Sensitivity

机译:三种不同的FDA批准的血浆HIV-1 RNA检测平台的比较证实,尽管检测灵敏度有所提高,但病毒学终点仍为每毫升200拷贝

获取原文
           

摘要

Discrepancies between HIV-1 RNA results assayed by different FDA-approved platforms have been reported. Plasma samples collected from 332 randomly selected clinical trial participants during the second year of antiretroviral treatment were assayed with three FDA-approved platforms: UltraSensitive Roche Amplicor Monitor, v1.5 (Monitor), the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 test on the m2000 system (Abbott), and the Roche TaqMan HIV-1 test, v2.0 (TaqMan). Samples from 61 additional participants with confirmed HIV-1 RNA levels of >50 copies/ml during trial follow-up were also included. Endpoints were HIV-1 RNA quantification of ≤50 copies/ml versus >50 copies/ml at an individual-sample level (primary) and determination of confirmed virologic failure (VF) from longitudinal samples. A total of 389 participants had results obtained from all assays on at least one sample (median = 6). Proportions of results of >50 copies/ml were 19% (Monitor), 22% (TaqMan), and 25% (Abbott). Despite indication of strong agreement (Cohen's kappa, 0.76 to 0.82), Abbott was more likely to detect HIV-1 RNA levels of >50 copies/ml than Monitor (matched-pair odds ratio [mOR] = 4.2; modified Obuchowski P < 0.001) and TaqMan (mOR = 2.1; P < 0.001); TaqMan was more likely than Monitor (mOR = 2.6; P < 0.001). Despite strong agreement in classifying VF across assay comparisons (kappa, 0.75 to 0.92), at a 50-copies/ml threshold, differences in the probability of VF classification (in the same direction as primary) were apparent (all McNemar's P < 0.007). At a 200-copies/ml VF threshold, no differences between assays were apparent (all P > 0.13). Despite strong agreement among assays, significant differences were observed with respect to detecting HIV-1 RNA levels of >50 copies/ml and identifying VF at the 50-copies/ml threshold. This has important implications for the definition of VF in clinical trials and clinical practice.
机译:据报道,通过不同的FDA批准的平台分析的HIV-1 RNA结果之间存在差异。在第二年的抗逆转录病毒治疗期间,从332个随机选择的临床试验参与者中收集的血浆样本已通过FDA批准的三个平台进行了分析:UltraSensitive Roche Amplicor Monitor,v1.5(Monitor),在m2000系统上的Abbott RealTime HIV-1测试(雅培(Abbott))和罗氏TaqMan HIV-1测试版v2.0(TaqMan)。还包括来自61名其他参与者的样本,这些样本在试验随访期间被确认的HIV-1 RNA水平> 50拷贝/ ml。终点是在单个样本水平(主要)下,HIV-1 RNA定量≤50拷贝/ ml与> 50拷贝/ ml的比较,并确定纵向样品中已确认的病毒学衰竭(VF)。共有389名参与者从至少一种样品的所有测定中获得了结果(中位数= 6)。 > 50个拷贝/ ml的结果比例为19%(监控器),22%(TaqMan)和25%(Abbott)。尽管有明显的一致性(Cohen的kappa为0.76至0.82),但雅培比Monitor更有可能检测到HIV-1 RNA水平> 50拷贝/ ml(配对对优势比[mOR] = 4.2;改良的Obuchowski P <0.001)和TaqMan(mOR = 2.1; P <0.001); TaqMan比Monitor更有可能(mOR = 2.6; P <0.001)。尽管在各试验比较中对VF进行分类(kappa,0.75至0.92)方面达成了广泛共识,但在50拷贝/ ml的阈值下,VF分类的可能性存在明显差异(与原发相同)(所有McNemar's P <0.007)。在200拷贝/ ml VF阈值下,测定之间没有明显差异(所有 P 50拷贝/ ml的HIV-1 RNA水平和鉴定50拷贝/ ml阈值的VF方面仍观察到显着差异。这对临床试验和临床实践中VF的定义具有重要意义。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号