首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >“Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis,” Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Lyme Disease Spirochetes in Questing European Vector Ticks and in Feeding Ticks Removed from People
【24h】

“Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis,” Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Lyme Disease Spirochetes in Questing European Vector Ticks and in Feeding Ticks Removed from People

机译:在搜寻欧洲媒介虱和从人身上取下的虱子中,“ Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis”,无性浆细胞和莱姆病螺旋体

获取原文
       

摘要

To estimate the likelihood of people coming into contact with the recently described tick-borne agent “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis,” we compared its prevalence to those of Lyme disease spirochetes and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in questing adult Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in various Central European sites and examined ticks, which had been removed from people, for the presence of these pathogens. Whereas spirochetes infected questing adult ticks most frequently (22.3%), fewer than a third as many ticks were infected by “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” (6.2%), and about a sixth harbored A. phagocytophilum (3.9%). On average, every twelfth encounter of a person with an I. ricinus tick (8.1%) may bear the risk of acquiring “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis.” Although a fifth of the people (20%) had removed at least one tick infected by “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis,” none displayed symptoms described for this pathogen, suggesting that its transmission may not be immediate and/or that immunocompetent individuals may not be affected. Because immunosuppressed patients may be at a particular risk of developing symptoms, it should be considered that “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” appears to be the second most common pathogen in I. ricinus ticks. In our survey, only Borrelia afzelii appears to infect Central European vector ticks more frequently.
机译:为了估计人们接触到最近描述的壁虱传播媒介“ Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis”的可能性,我们将其流行程度与莱姆病螺旋体和吞噬无浆质体的流行程度进行了比较,以寻找在中欧各个地点收集的成年I轴虱,并进行了调查。这些病原体已从人们身上剔除的removed。螺旋藻感染的成年s虫感染频率最高(22.3%),而被“ Ca ”感染的tick虫数量却不到三分之一。 ”(6.2%),约有六分之一的噬菌体(3.9%)。平均而言,每十二次遭遇蓖麻毒tick的人(8.1%)可能会冒着获得“ Ca ”的风险。 miehurensis。”尽管五分之一的人(20%)已经去除了至少一个受“ Ca ”感染的tick。没有显示出对该病原体描述的症状,这表明其传播可能不是立即的,和/或免疫能力强的人可能没有受到影响。由于受到免疫抑制的患者可能有出现症状的特殊风险,因此应考虑“ Ca ”。似乎是米氏I虫中第二常见的病原体。在我们的调查中,只有非洲疏螺旋体似乎更频繁地感染中欧媒介tick。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号