...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Agar Dilution, Disk Diffusion, MicroScan, and Vitek Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods to Broth Microdilution for Detection of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Isolates of the FamilyEnterobacteriaceae
【24h】

Comparison of Agar Dilution, Disk Diffusion, MicroScan, and Vitek Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods to Broth Microdilution for Detection of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Isolates of the FamilyEnterobacteriaceae

机译:琼脂稀释,圆盘扩散,MicroScan和Vitek抗菌药敏测试方法与肉汤微稀释法检测耐肠杆菌科细菌对氟喹诺酮分离物的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Fluoroquinolone resistance appears to be increasing in many species of bacteria, particularly in those causing nosocomial infections. However, the accuracy of some antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for detecting fluoroquinolone resistance remains uncertain. Therefore, we compared the accuracy of the results of agar dilution, disk diffusion, MicroScan Walk Away Neg Combo 15 conventional panels, and Vitek GNS-F7 cards to the accuracy of the results of the broth microdilution reference method for detection of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin resistance in 195 clinical isolates of the familyEnterobacteriaceae collected from six U.S. hospitals for a national surveillance project (Project ICARE [Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology]). For ciprofloxacin, very major error rates were 0% (disk diffusion and MicroScan), 0.9% (agar dilution), and 2.7% (Vitek), while major error rates ranged from 0% (agar dilution) to 3.7% (MicroScan and Vitek). Minor error rates ranged from 12.3% (agar dilution) to 20.5% (MicroScan). For ofloxacin, no very major errors were observed, and major errors were noted only with MicroScan (3.7% major error rate). Minor error rates ranged from 8.2% (agar dilution) to 18.5% (Vitek). Minor errors for all methods were substantially reduced when results with MICs within ±1 dilution of the broth microdilution reference MIC were excluded from analysis. However, the high number of minor errors by all test systems remains a concern.
机译:氟喹诺酮耐药性在许多细菌中似乎正在增加,特别是在引起医院感染的细菌中。然而,一些用于检测氟喹诺酮耐药性的抗菌药敏试验方法的准确性仍不确定。因此,我们将琼脂稀释,圆盘扩散,MicroScan Walk Away Neg Combo 15常规面板和Vitek GNS-F7卡的结果的准确性与肉汤微稀释参考法检测环丙沙星和氧氟沙星耐药性的结果的准确性进行了比较。收集自美国六家医院的195个肠杆菌科家族临床分离株,用于一项国家监测项目(ICARE项目[重症监护抗菌素耐药性流行病学])。对于环丙沙星,主要错误率分别为0%(盘扩散和MicroScan),0.9%(琼脂稀释度)和2.7%(Vitek),而主要错误率介于0%(琼脂稀释度)至3.7%(MicroScan和Vitek)之间)。次要错误率范围从12.3%(琼脂稀释)到20.5%(MicroScan)。对于氧氟沙星,没有观察到非常严重的错误,只有使用MicroScan时才注意到主要错误(主要错误率3.7%)。次要错误率范围从8.2%(琼脂稀释)到18.5%(Vitek)。当将肉汤微量稀释参考MIC的±1稀释范围内的MIC的结果排除在分析范围之外时,所有方法的次要误差都将大大降低。但是,所有测试系统的大量次要错误仍然令人担忧。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号