首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Techniques for Investigating Outbreaks of Enteritis Due to Campylobacters
【24h】

Comparison of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Techniques for Investigating Outbreaks of Enteritis Due to Campylobacters

机译:脉冲场凝胶电泳和扩增的片段长度多态性技术比较调查弯曲杆菌引起的肠炎的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Campylobacters are the most commonly reported cause of acute bacterial enteritis in the United Kingdom and United States, with poultry, milk, and water implicated as sources or vehicles of infection. The majority of campylobacter infections are sporadic, although outbreaks may occur, and these provide an opportunity to evaluate genotypic fingerprinting techniques. In this study, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was compared with single-enzyme-amplified fragment length polymorphism (SAFLP). The results for the three separate episodes indicated that SAFLP and PFGE both clustered the strains from the first incident as 100% homologous. The strains from the second and third incidents clustered as distinct from both the first incident and from each other. PFGE is well recognized as a discriminatory fingerprinting technique for campylobacters; however, SAFLP has proven to be equally discriminatory, but far less labor intensive and with the added advantages of less “hands-on” time and inexpensive equipment, it is an excellent alternative to PFGE for investigation of outbreaks.
机译:在英国和美国,弯曲杆菌是最常见的急性细菌性肠炎的病因,家禽,牛奶和水被认为是感染的来源或媒介。尽管可能会发生暴发,但大多数弯曲杆菌感染是偶发性的,这为评估基因型指纹技术提供了机会。在这项研究中,脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)与单酶扩增片段长度多态性(SAFLP)进行了比较。三个独立事件的结果表明,SAFLP和PFGE都将第一次事件中的菌株聚类为100%同源。来自第二和第三事件的应变聚集在一起,与第一事件和彼此不同。 PFGE是公认的弯曲杆菌指纹鉴定技术。但是,事实证明,SAFLP具有同等的歧视性,但是劳动强度低得多,并且具有“动手”时间少且设备便宜的附加优点,它是PFGE暴发调查的绝佳替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号