...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Performance of Three Commercial Viral Load Assays, Versant Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) RNA bDNA v3.0, Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2, Testing HIV-1 Non-B Subtypes and Recombinant Variants
【24h】

Performance of Three Commercial Viral Load Assays, Versant Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) RNA bDNA v3.0, Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2, Testing HIV-1 Non-B Subtypes and Recombinant Variants

机译:进行三种商业病毒载量测定,完整的1型人类免疫缺陷病毒RNA bDNA v3.0,Cobas AmpliPrep / Cobas TaqMan HIV-1和NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2,测试HIV-1非B亚型和重组变体

获取原文
           

摘要

Monitoring antiretroviral therapy requires that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viremia assays are applicable to all distinct variants. This study evaluates the performance of three commercial viral load assays—Versant HIV-1 RNA bDNA v3.0, Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2—in testing 83 plasma specimens from patients carrying HIV-1 non-B subtypes and recombinants previously defined by phylogenetic analysis of the pol gene. All 28 specimens from patients under treatment presented viremia values below the detection limit with the three methods. In the remaining 55 specimens from naive individuals viremia could not be detected in 32.7, 20, and 14.6% using the NucliSens, Versant, or TaqMan tests, respectively, suggesting potential viral load underestimation of some samples by all techniques. Only 32 (58.2%) samples from naive subjects were quantified by the three methods; the NucliSens test provided the highest HIV RNA values (mean, 4.87 log copies/ml), and the Versant test provided the lowest (mean, 4.16 log copies/ml). Viremia differences of greater than 1 log were seen in 8 (14.5%) of 55 specimens, occurring in 10.9, 7.3, and 5.4%, respectively, of the specimens in comparisons of Versant versus NucliSens, Versant versus TaqMan, and TaqMan versus NucliSens. Differences greater than 0.5 log, considered significant for clinicians, occurred in 45.5, 27.3, and 29% when the same assays were compared. Some HIV-1 strains, such as subtype G and CRF02_AG, showed more discrepancies in distinct quantification methods than others. In summary, an adequate design of primers and probes is needed for optimal quantitation of plasma HIV-RNA in non-B subtypes. Our data emphasize the need to use the same method for monitoring patients on therapy and also the convenience of HIV-1 subtyping.
机译:监测抗逆转录病毒疗法要求人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)病毒血症检测方法适用于所有不同的变体。这项研究评估了三种商业病毒载量测定法(Versant HIV-1 RNA bDNA v3.0,Cobas AmpliPrep / Cobas TaqMan HIV-1和NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2)在检测携带HIV的患者的83个血浆样本中的性能-1个非B亚型和重组体,以前是通过 pol 基因的系统发育分析确定的。通过三种方法,来自接受治疗的患者的所有28个标本的病毒血症值均低于检测极限。使用NucliSens,Versant或TaqMan测试分别在32.7、20和14.6%的样本中未检测到55份来自幼稚个体的病毒血症,表明所有技术均可能低估了某些样本的病毒载量。通过这三种方法仅对来自天真的受试者的32个样本(58.2%)进行了定量。 NucliSens测试提供了最高的HIV RNA值(平均值为4.87对数/毫升),而Versant测试提供了最低的(平均值为4.16对数/毫升)。在Versant与NucliSens,Versant与TaqMan和TaqMan与NucliSens的比较中,在55个样本中有8个(14.5%)的病毒血症差异大于1 log,分别出现在样本的10.9、7.3和5.4%中。当比较相同的检测方法时,对临床医生而言意义重大的大于0.5 log的差异发生在45.5%,27.3%和29%。一些HIV-1菌株,例如G型和CRF02_AG亚型,在不同的定量方法中显示出比其他菌株更多的差异。总之,需要对引物和探针进行适当设计,以最佳定量非B亚型的血浆HIV-RNA。我们的数据强调需要使用相同的方法来监测患者的治疗情况,以及HIV-1分型的便利性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号