首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gram-negative bacteria.
【24h】

Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gram-negative bacteria.

机译:评估两个BBL晶体系统以鉴定一些临床上重要的革兰氏阴性细菌。

获取原文
       

摘要

The BBL Crystal system (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) is a miniaturized bacterial identification method employing modified conventional and chromogenic substrates. Two products are currently available, the Rapid Stool/Enteric ID Kit and the Enteric/Nonfermenter ID Kit, each comprising thirty tests. We report an evaluation of both systems (using database version 1.1 for both) in the identification of 51 gram-negative taxa likely to be encountered commonly in the clinical laboratory. In all, 266 strains were tested in the Enteric/Nonfermenter ID Kit, and these represented 36 taxa of the family Enterobacteriaceae (188 strains), 5 oxidase-positive fermentative taxa (26 strains), and 10 nonfermentative taxa (52 strains). The majority of these same strains (203 of 266) were also tested in the Rapid Stool/Enteric ID Kit. The Enteric/Nonfermenter ID Kit performed as follows: Enterobacteriaceae, 93% correct, 6% not identified, and 1% incorrect; oxidase-positive fermenters, 88, 12, and 0%, respectively; and nonfermenters, 100% correct, although several only to the genus or group level. The Rapid Stool/Enteric ID Kit gave the following results: Enterobacteriaceae, 91% correct, 7% not identified, and 2% incorrect; oxidase-positive fermenters, 80, 13, and 7%, respectively (but results were based on only 15 strains); and nonfermenters, 100% correct (but results were based on only 11 strains). We found the systems extremely easy and rapid to use, and for the Enteric/Nonfermenter ID Kit an identification rate of 100% in 40 of 51 taxa was achieved, with corresponding figures of 29 of 39 taxa for the Rapid Stool/Enteric ID Kit.
机译:BBL晶体系统(Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems,马里兰州科基斯维尔)是一种采用改良的常规底物和生色底物的小型细菌鉴定方法。当前有两种产品,Rapid Stool /肠溶ID试剂盒和肠溶/非发酵剂ID试剂盒,每个产品包含三十项测试。我们报告了两种系统的评估(两种系统均使用数据库版本1.1),以确定在临床实验室中通常会遇到的51克阴性菌群。在肠溶/非发酵罐ID试剂盒中共测试了266株,代表肠杆菌科的36个分类单元(188株),氧化酶阳性发酵的分类单元(26个菌株)和10个非发酵的分类单元(52个菌株)。这些相同菌株中的大多数(266个中的203个)也在Rapid Stool / Enteric ID Kit中进行了测试。肠/非发酵剂ID试剂盒的操作如下:肠杆菌科,正确率为93%,未鉴定为6%,错误为1%;氧化酶阳性发酵罐分别为88%,12%和0%;和非发酵罐,则100%正确,尽管只有几个属于属或组水平。快速粪便/肠溶ID试剂盒给出以下结果:肠杆菌科,正确率为91%,未鉴定为7%,错误为2%。氧化酶阳性发酵罐分别为80、13和7%(但结果仅基于15个菌株);非发酵罐,则100%正确(但结果仅基于11个菌株)。我们发现该系统非常易于使用和快速,对于肠溶/非发酵剂ID试剂盒,在51种分类中有40种获得了100%的识别率,而在快速粪便/肠溶ID试剂盒中,在39种分类中,有29%的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号