首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Proposed Standard and the E-Test with the NCCLS Broth Microdilution Method for Voriconazole and Caspofungin Susceptibility Testing of Yeast Species
【24h】

Comparison of the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Proposed Standard and the E-Test with the NCCLS Broth Microdilution Method for Voriconazole and Caspofungin Susceptibility Testing of Yeast Species

机译:欧洲抗生素敏感性试验委员会拟议标准的抗真菌敏感性试验小组委员会与Voriconazole的NCCLS肉汤微稀释法和酵母菌的卡泊芬净敏感性试验的E-Tes​​t的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The proposed standard of the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (AFST-EUCAST) and the E-test procedures were compared with the NCCLS reference broth microdilution method for voriconazole and caspofungin susceptibility testing of 102 clinical Candida species and Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates. The voriconazole MIC at which 50% of strains were inhibited (MIC50) was ≤0.125 mg/liter for all yeast species except for Candida glabrata and Candida krusei, which yielded MIC50 values of 0.25 to 1 mg/liter depending on the method. Caspofungin exhibited in vitro activity (MIC50 of ≤0.125 to 2 mg/liter) against all yeast species except for Candida guilliermondii. The agreements between MICs within ±2 dilutions obtained by the NCCLS method and the EUCAST standard were 97% for voriconazole and 96% for caspofungin. Intraclass correlation coefficients were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The agreements between voriconazole MICs provided by the E-test and the NCCLS and between the E-test and the AFST-EUCAST method were 100 and 90%, respectively. Because of lower caspofungin MICs provided by the E-test, the agreement was slightly poorer with the NCCLS method (89%) than with the AFST-EUCAST procedure (94%). Both the EUCAST and the E-test procedures can be reliable techniques for susceptibility testing of yeasts to voriconazole and caspofungin.
机译:将欧洲抗生素敏感性试验委员会(AFST-EUCAST)的抗真菌敏感性试验小组委员会的拟议标准和E-test程序与伏立康唑和卡泊芬净敏感性试验的NCLLS参考肉汤微量稀释法进行了比较,对102例临床 Candida> 物种和酿酒酵母分离株。除 glabrata Candida krusei <之外,所有酵母菌中抑制50%菌株(MIC 50 )的伏立康唑MIC≤0.125mg / L / em>,根据方法,其MIC 50 值为0.25至1 mg / L。卡泊芬净对除 Candida guilliermondii 以外的所有酵母菌均具有体外活性(MIC 50 ≤0.125至2 mg / L)。通过NCCLS方法和EUCAST标准获得的±2稀释度内的MIC之间的一致性为伏立康唑为97%,卡泊芬净为96%。类内相关系数具有统计学意义( P <0.05)。 E-test和NCCLS提供的伏立康唑MIC之间的一致性以及E-test和AFST-EUCAST方法之间的一致性分别为100%和90%。由于E检验提供的卡泊芬净MIC较低,因此使用NCCLS方法(89%)比使用AFST-EUCAST程序(94%)的协议稍差。 EUCAST和E-test程序均可作为可靠的技术对酵母菌进行伏立康唑和卡泊芬净的敏感性测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号