首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >In elderly persons live attenuated influenza A virus vaccines do not offer an advantage over inactivated virus vaccine in inducing serum or secretory antibodies or local immunologic memory.
【24h】

In elderly persons live attenuated influenza A virus vaccines do not offer an advantage over inactivated virus vaccine in inducing serum or secretory antibodies or local immunologic memory.

机译:在老年人中,减毒的甲型流感病毒活疫苗在诱导血清或分泌性抗体或局部免疫记忆方面不优于灭活病毒疫苗。

获取原文
           

摘要

In a double-blind, randomized trial, 102 healthy elderly subjects were inoculated with one of four preparations: (i) intranasal bivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine containing cold-adapted A/Kawasaki/86 (H1N1) and cold-adapted A/Bethesda/85 (H3N2) viruses; (ii) parenteral trivalent inactivated subvirion vaccine containing A/Taiwan/86 (H1N1), A/Leningrad/86 (H3N2), and B/Ann Arbor/86 antigens; (iii) both vaccines; or (iv) placebo. To determine whether local or systemic immunization augmented mucosal immunologic memory, all volunteers were challenged intranasally 12 weeks later with the inactivated virus vaccine. We used a hemagglutination inhibition assay to measure antibodies in sera and a kinetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies in sera and nasal washes, respectively. In comparison with the live virus vaccine, the inactivated virus vaccine elicited higher and more frequent rises of serum antibodies, while nasal wash antibody responses were similar. The vaccine combination induced serum and local antibodies slightly more often than the inactivated vaccine alone did. Coadministration of live influenza A virus vaccine did not alter the serum antibody response to the influenza B virus component of the inactivated vaccine. The anamnestic nasal antibody response elicited by intranasal inactivated virus challenge did not differ in the live, inactivated, or combined vaccine groups from that observed in the placebo group not previously immunized. These results suggest that in elderly persons cold-adapted influenza A virus vaccines offer little advantage over inactivated virus vaccines in terms of inducing serum or secretory antibody or local immunological memory. Studies are needed to determine whether both vaccines in combination are more efficacious than inactivated vaccine alone in people in this age group.
机译:在一项双盲,随机试验中,对102位健康的老年受试者接种了以下四种制剂之一:(i)鼻内二价活减毒流感疫苗,其中包含冷适应的A /川崎/ 86(H1N1)和冷适应的A / Bethesda / 85(H3N2)病毒; (ii)含有A /台湾/ 86(H1N1),A / Leningrad / 86(H3N2)和B / Ann Arbor / 86抗原的肠胃外三价灭活亚病毒疫苗; (iii)两种疫苗;或(iv)安慰剂。为了确定局部或全身免疫是否增强了粘膜免疫记忆,在12周后对所有志愿者进行了灭活病毒疫苗的鼻内攻击。我们使用血凝抑制测定法测定血清中的抗体,并使用动力学酶联免疫吸附测定法测定血清和鼻洗液中的免疫球蛋白G(IgG)和IgA抗体。与活病毒疫苗相比,灭活病毒疫苗引起血清抗体升高的频率越来越高,而鼻洗抗体反应相似。与仅灭活疫苗相比,疫苗组合诱导血清和局部抗体的频率略高。甲型流感活病毒疫苗的共同给药不会改变对灭活疫苗中乙型流感病毒成分的血清抗体反应。在活疫苗,灭活疫苗或联合疫苗组中,鼻内灭活病毒攻击引起的记忆性鼻抗体应答与之前未免疫的安慰剂组没有区别。这些结果表明,在老年人中,在诱导血清或分泌抗体或局部免疫记忆方面,冷适应的甲型流感病毒疫苗与灭活的病毒疫苗相比几乎没有优势。需要进行研究以确定在这个年龄段的人群中,两种疫苗联合使用是否比单独的灭活疫苗更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号