...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparative evaluation of two test methods (enzyme immunoassay and latex fixation) for the detection of heterophil antibodies in infectious mononucleosis.
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of two test methods (enzyme immunoassay and latex fixation) for the detection of heterophil antibodies in infectious mononucleosis.

机译:两种检测方法(酶免疫测定和乳胶固定)的比较评估,用于检测传染性单核细胞增多症中的异源抗体。

获取原文
           

摘要

The present study evaluated the Ventrescreen Mono enzyme immunoassay (Ventrex Laboratories) and Monolatex (Wampole Laboratories) for detection of infectious mononucleosis-specific heterophil antibodies by comparing test results on sera of 247 symptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to compare not only the two different test systems but also the two different methods they represent for accuracy in detecting infectious mononucleosis-specific heterophil antibodies. Discrepancies in the test results of the two kits were arbitrated by determining the Epstein-Barr virus antibody profiles of the samples. The study showed that the Ventrescreen Mono enzyme immunoassay is as good as the Monolatex test for detecting heterophil antibodies. After discrepancies were resolved, the sensitivity and specificity of the Ventrescreen assay were 100 and 98%, respectively.
机译:本研究通过比较247例有症状患者的血清检测结果,评估了Ventrescreen Mono酶免疫测定法(Ventrex Laboratories)和Monolatex(Wampole Laboratories)用于检测传染性单核细胞增多症特异性异源抗体的能力。这项研究的目的不仅是比较两种不同的测试系统,而且还比较它们代表的两种不同方法,以提高检测传染性单核细胞增多症特异性异源抗体的准确性。通过确定样品的爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒抗体图谱,对两个试剂盒测试结果的差异进行仲裁。研究表明,Ventrescreen Mono酶免疫测定法与用于检测嗜异性抗体的Monolatex试验一样好。解决差异后,Ventrescreen检测的灵敏度和特异性分别为100%和98%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号