...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Interlaboratory drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a radiometric procedure and two conventional methods.
【24h】

Interlaboratory drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a radiometric procedure and two conventional methods.

机译:结核分枝杆菌的实验室间药敏试验通过放射程序和两种常规方法进行。

获取原文
           

摘要

A total of 224 recent isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from 163 patients selected to have multidrug resistance were tested against streptomycin (SM), isoniazid, rifampin, and ethambutol (EMB) by the rapid radiometric BACTEC method and two conventional proportion methods: the World Health Organization (WHO) method, using Lowenstein-Jensen medium; and the Veterans Administration reference laboratory for mycobacteria (VA) method, using Middlebrook 7H10 agar medium. The results were compared, focusing on the concentrations of the drugs in all three methods. Among the four drugs tested, most of the discrepancies in measured activity were observed with SM and EMB, generally because of differences in the drug concentrations used by the three methods. A 4-micrograms amount of SM in the BACTEC method was found to be slightly less active than 10 micrograms in the VA method and significantly more active than 4 micrograms of dihydrostreptomycin in the WHO method. With EMB, 2.5 micrograms in BACTEC was similar to 5 micrograms in the VA method and 2 micrograms in the WHO method, while 10 micrograms in the BACTEC method was found to be more active than 10 and 2 micrograms in the VA and WHO methods, respectively. To attain close agreement, drug concentrations used in the BACTEC method should be carefully selected when a comparison is to be made with any conventional method employed in a laboratory. Standardization of in vitro susceptibility testing is greatly needed to achieve uniformity among the test methods used to evaluate tuberculosis therapeutics.
机译:通过快速放射BACTEC方法和两种常规配比方法,对来自163名被选为具有多重耐药性的163名患者的结核分枝杆菌的最新224株分离株进行了针对链霉素(SM),异烟肼,利福平和乙胺丁醇(EMB)的测试。 (WHO)方法,使用Lowenstein-Jensen培养基;和退伍军人管理局参考实验室的分枝杆菌(VA)方法,使用Middlebrook 7H10琼脂培养基。比较了结果,集中于所有三种方法中的药物浓度。在所测试的四种药物中,使用SM和EMB观察到了大多数活性测定差异,这通常是由于这三种方法使用的药物浓度不同。发现BACTEC方法中4毫克的SM活性比VA方法中的10微克活性稍差,而WHO法中的4毫克二氢链霉素则活性明显更高。对于EMB,BACTEC中的2.5微克与VA方法中的5微克和WHO方法中的2微克相似,而BACTEC方法中的10微克分别比VA和WHO方法中的10微克和2微克更有活性。 。为了达成一致,在与实验室中使用的任何常规方法进行比较时,应仔细选择BACTEC方法中使用的药物浓度。为了在评估结核病治疗方法的测试方法之间取得统一,非常需要体外药敏试验的标准化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号