首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Three rapid methods compared with a conventional method for detection of urease production in anaerobic bacteria.
【24h】

Three rapid methods compared with a conventional method for detection of urease production in anaerobic bacteria.

机译:与用于检测厌氧细菌中尿素酶产生的常规方法相比,三种快速方法。

获取原文
           

摘要

Three rapid methods (spot test, disk, and tube) for detecting urease production in anaerobic bacteria yielded results faster than the conventional method. The results were more consistent with the disk and tube methods than with the spot test. Blood agar plate growth gave more consistent results than growth from chopped-meat slants.
机译:用于检测厌氧细菌中脲酶产生的三种快速方法(点检,圆盘和试管)比常规方法更快地产生结果。与圆盘和管法相比,结果与现场测试更为一致。血琼脂平板的生长比切碎肉倾斜的生长更一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号