...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Spiral gradient endpoint method compared to standard agar dilution for susceptibility testing of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli.
【24h】

Spiral gradient endpoint method compared to standard agar dilution for susceptibility testing of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli.

机译:螺旋梯度终点法与标准琼脂稀释液相比,可用于厌氧革兰氏阴性菌的药敏试验。

获取原文
           

摘要

More efficient and reproducible alternative methods of performing agar dilution susceptibility testing are desirable, particularly for anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobes generally grow more reliably on solid media than they do in broth microdilution wells. A new method, the revised spiral gradient endpoint (SGE) method, was evaluated against the standard agar dilution (SAD) method by using a wide variety of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli (161 strains) and eight antimicrobial agents. For the SGE method, a spiral plater was used to set up a concentration gradient of an antimicrobial agent within an agar plate across which bacterial strains were inoculated as radial streaks. After incubation, the MIC of the antimicrobial agent was calculated from the radial endpoint location where bacterial growth ceased along the streak. The MICs for 90% of strains tested (in micrograms per milliliter) and the cumulative percentages of susceptible strains at the breakpoints for the SGE and SAD methods, respectively, and for all 161 strains were as follows: for metronidazole, 2 and 100 versus 2 and 100; for imipenem, 1 and 99 versus 0.5 and 98; for ampicillin-sulbactam, 8 and 97 versus 8 and 98; for clindamycin, 4 and 90 versus 4 and 91; for cefoxitin, 32 and 95 versus 32 and 95; for mezlocillin, 256 and 88 versus greater than 128 and 86; for ampicillin, greater than or equal to 256 and 51 versus greater than 64 and 51; and for penicillin (in units per milliliter), greater than or equal to 512 and 71 versus greater than 64 and 65. The excellent agreement of these data and the greater sensitivity reproducibility, and efficiency of the revised SGE method warrant further evaluations. Assuming that these advantages are confirmed, the revised SGE method should be a useful alternative test method when detailed susceptibility data are desired.
机译:需要进行琼脂稀释敏感性试验的更有效和可再现的替代方法,特别是对于厌氧细菌。通常,厌氧菌在固体培养基上的生长要比肉汤微稀释井中的更为可靠。通过使用多种厌氧革兰氏阴性杆菌(161株)和八种抗菌剂,针对标准琼脂稀释(SAD)方法评估了一种新方法,即修正的螺旋梯度终点(SGE)方法。对于SGE方法,使用螺旋压板机在琼脂平板内建立抗菌剂的浓度梯度,细菌菌株作为径向条纹接种在琼脂平板上。孵育后,从细菌沿条纹停止生长的径向终点位置计算出抗菌剂的MIC。对于SGE和SAD方法以及所有161个菌株,分别对90%的测试菌株的MIC(以微克每毫升为单位)和在突变点的敏感菌株的累积百分比如下:对于甲硝唑,分别为2和100与2和100;亚胺培南的1和99对0.5和98;氨苄西林舒巴坦分别为8和97与8和98;对于克林霉素,分别为4和90与4和91;对于头孢西丁,分别为32和95与32和95;对于美洛西林,分别为256和88和大于128和86;对于氨苄西林,大于或等于256和51,而大于或等于64和51;对于青霉素(以每毫升为单位),大于或等于512和71,而大于或等于64和65。这些数据的高度一致性以及更高的灵敏度重现性和改进的SGE方法的效率值得进一步评估。假定这些优点已得到证实,当需要详细的磁化率数据时,修订的SGE方法应是有用的替代测试方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号