首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Indexes of Aortic Pressure Augmentation Markedly Underestimate the Contribution of Reflected Waves Toward Variations in Aortic Pressure and Left Ventricular MassNovelty and Significance
【24h】

Indexes of Aortic Pressure Augmentation Markedly Underestimate the Contribution of Reflected Waves Toward Variations in Aortic Pressure and Left Ventricular MassNovelty and Significance

机译:主动脉压力增强指标明显低估了反射波对主动脉压力和左心室质量变化的贡献。

获取原文
           

摘要

Although indexes of wave reflection enhance risk prediction, the extent to which measures of aortic systolic pressure augmentation (augmented pressures [Pa] or augmentation index) underestimate the effects of reflected waves on cardiovascular risk is uncertain. In participants from a community sample (age >16), we compared the relative contribution of reflected (backward wave pressures and the reflected wave index [RI]) versus augmented (Pa and augmentation index) pressure wave indexes to variations in central aortic pulse pressure (PPc; n=1185), and left ventricular mass index (LVMI; n=793). Aortic hemodynamics and LVMI were determined using radial applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor) and echocardiography. Independent of confounders, RI and backward wave pressures contributed more than forward wave pressures, whereas Pa and augmentation index contributed less than incident wave pressure to variations in PPc ( P <0.0001 for comparison of partial r values). In those <50 years of age, while backward wave pressures (partial r =0.28, P <0.0001) contributed more than forward wave pressures (partial r =0.15, P <0.001; P <0.05 for comparison of r values), Pa (partial r =0.13, P <0.005) contributed to a similar extent as incident wave pressure (partial r =0.22, P <0.0001) to variations in LVMI. Furthermore, in those ≥50 years of age, backward wave pressures (partial r =0.21, P <0.0001), but not forward wave pressures ( P =0.98), while incident wave pressure (partial r =0.23, P <0.0001), but not Pa ( P =0.80) were associated with LVMI. Pa and augmentation index underestimated the effect of wave reflection on PPc and LVMI in both men and women. Thus, as compared with relations between indexes of aortic pressure augmentation and PPc or LVMI, strikingly better relations are noted between aortic wave reflection and PPc or LVMI.# Novelty and Significance {#article-title-31}
机译:尽管波反射的指标可增强风险预测,但尚不确定主动脉收缩压增大(增强压力[Pa]或增大指数)的措施低估了反射波对心血管风险的影响的程度。在来自社区样本(年龄> 16)的参与者中,我们比较了反射(后向波压力和反射波指数[RI])与增强(Pa和增强指数)压力波指数对中央主动脉脉压变化的相对贡献(PPc; n = 1185)和左心室质量指数(LVMI; n = 793)。主动脉血流动力学和LVMI使用radial骨压平术(SphygmoCor)和超声心动图确定。独立于混杂因素,RI和后向波压力对PPc的变化贡献大于前向波压力,而Pa和增强指数对入射波压力的贡献小于入射波压力(对于偏r值的比较,P <0.0001)。在那些<50岁的年龄段中,后向波压力(部分r = 0.28,P <0.0001)的贡献要大于正向波压力(部分r = 0.15,P <0.001; P <0.05,以比较r值),Pa(部分r = 0.13,P <0.005)对入射光压的贡献程度类似(部分r = 0.22,P <0.0001)对LVMI的变化有相似的影响。此外,在≥50岁的人群中,后向波压力(部分r = 0.21,P <0.0001),但不是前向波压力(P = 0.98),而入射波压力(部分r = 0.23,P <0.0001),而不是Pa(P = 0.80)与LVMI相关。 Pa和增强指数低估了男性中波反射对PPc和LVMI的影响。因此,与主动脉增高指标与PPc或LVMI之间的关系相比,主动脉波反射与PPc或LVMI之间的关系明显更好。#新奇与意义{#article-title-31}

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号