首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Coronary Vasodilator Capacity and Epicardial Vessel Remodeling in Physiological and Hypertensive Hypertrophy
【24h】

Coronary Vasodilator Capacity and Epicardial Vessel Remodeling in Physiological and Hypertensive Hypertrophy

机译:生理性和高血压性肥大中的冠状血管舒张功能和心外膜血管重塑

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract —The aim of this study was to compare resting coronary flow velocity, determinants of myocardial oxygen demand, and coronary vasodilator capacity in subjects with physiological, exercise-induced, and hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy. Sixteen healthy sedentary men, 16 endurance athletes, and 16 hypertensive subjects (mean±SEM for left ventricular mass index: 94.9±5.5, 184.6±8.4, 154.4±9.5 g/m2, respectively) were studied by transesophageal and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Coronary flow velocity in left anterior descending artery and cross-sectional area of left main artery were assessed at rest and during dipyridamole-induced vasodilation. Myocardial oxygen demand was estimated through rate-pressure product, left ventricular wall stress, and inotropic function. Coronary flow reserve and minimum coronary resistance were comparable to those of sedentary men in athletes (mean±SEM: 3.23±0.16 versus 3.60±0.18 and 0.96±0.06 versus 1.04±0.04 mm Hg · s · cm?1), while in hypertensive subjects they were decreased and increased, respectively (mean±SEM: 2.31±0.08 and 1.21±0.10 mm Hg · s · cm?1; P <0.05 for both). Resting flow velocity was directly related to rate-pressure product in sedentary men and athletes and also to wall stress in athletes, while these correlations were absent in hypertensives. Dilation of left main artery after dipyridamole was significantly higher in athletes than in sedentary men and hypertensive subjects (mean±SEM for area change: 32.9±3.7% versus 12.8±2.5% and 6.4±3.3%; P <0.05 and 0.01). These data indicate that vasodilator capacity of coronary microcirculation is not impaired in athletes with physiological hypertrophy, in contrast to hypertensive patients. The relationship between resting flow velocity and determinants of oxygen demand is preserved in physiological hypertrophy but missing in hypertensive hypertrophy. Furthermore, the vasodilator capacity of coronary macrocirculation is also enhanced in exercise-trained subjects.
机译:摘要—本研究的目的是比较患有生理性,运动诱发性和高血压性左心室肥厚的受试者的静息冠状动脉流速,心肌需氧量的决定因素和冠状血管舒张能力。通过食道和经胸多普勒超声心动图检查了16名健康的久坐男性,16名耐力运动员和16名高血压受试者(左心室质量指数的平均值±SEM:分别为94.9±5.5、184.6±8.4、154.4±9.5 g / m2)。静态和双嘧达莫引起的血管舒张过程中评估左前降支的冠状动脉流速和左主动脉的横截面积。通过心率压力乘积,左心室壁压力和变力功能来估计心肌需氧量。运动员的冠状动脉血流储备和最小冠脉阻力与久坐的男性相当(平均值±SEM:3.23±0.16 vs 3.60±0.18和0.96±0.06 vs 1.04±0.04 mm Hg·s·cm?1),而在高血压受试者中它们分别降低和增加(平均值±SEM:2.31±0.08和1.21±0.10 mm Hg·s·cm?1; P均<0.05)。在久坐的男子和运动员中,静息流速与速率-压力乘积直接相关,在运动员中,静息流速与壁压力直接相关,而在高血压中,这些相关性则不存在。双嘧达莫后运动员左主动脉的扩张显着高于久坐的男性和高血压受试者(面积变化的平均值±SEM:32.9±3.7%,而12.8±2.5%和6.4±3.3%; P < 0.05和0.01)。这些数据表明,与高血压患者相比,患有生理性肥大的运动员的冠状动脉微循环血管舒张功能没有受到损害。生理性肥大中保留了静息流速与需氧量决定因素之间的关系,而高血压性肥大中却没有。此外,在运动训练的受试者中,冠状动脉大循环的血管扩张能力也得到增强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号