...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Locoregional therapy response in patients with hepatocellular cancer waiting for liver transplantation: Only selection or biological effect?
【24h】

Locoregional therapy response in patients with hepatocellular cancer waiting for liver transplantation: Only selection or biological effect?

机译:等待肝移植的肝细胞癌患者局部治疗反应:仅仅是选择还是生物学作用?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Locoregional treatments (LRT) represent a broad strategy used for reducing the risk of drop-off and contextually improving the survivals in patients with hepatocellular cancer receiving a liver transplantation (LT). However, it is not sufficiently clear if LRT are only a surrogate of tumor aggressiveness or if they consent a real benefit in terms of tumor stabilization. A recent study by Pommergaard et al reported the results from the European Liver Transplant Registry. Patients receiving LRT before LT had better 5-year survival rates respect to no-LRT cases (69.7% vs 65.8%; P < 0.001). When the number of LRT was tested, one-to-two treatments were connected with improved survivals respect to no treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85 and 0.71, respectively]. The efficacy of LRT was also reported in the presence of larger tumors (HR = 0.78) and micro-macrovascular invasion (HR = 0.71). The results observed in the present study are partially in discordance with other analyses showing a detrimental effect of LRT. The main problem in the interpretation of these results is connected with the possible initial selection biases present in the studies. The most recent guidelines suggest to perform LRT before the transplant, but the level of evidence is typically low due to the absence of prospectively designed studies.
机译:局部治疗(LRT)代表了一种广泛的策略,可用于降低接受肝移植(LT)的肝细胞癌患者的脱落风险并从上下文上提高其生存率。然而,目前还不清楚LRT只是肿瘤侵袭性的替代品还是它们在肿瘤稳定方面是否具有真正的益处。 Pommergaard等人的最新研究报告了欧洲肝移植注册中心的结果。相对于无LRT病例,LT前接受LRT的患者5年生存率更高(69.7%vs 65.8%; P <0.001)。当测试LRT的数量时,相对于不进行治疗,一到两次治疗与改善的生存率相关[危险比(HR)分别为0.85和0.71]。在存在较大肿瘤(HR = 0.78)和微微血管侵犯(HR = 0.71)的情况下,还报道了LRT的疗效。在本研究中观察到的结果与显示LRT有害作用的其他分析部分不一致。这些结果的解释中的主要问题与研究中可能存在的初始选择偏倚有关。最新指南建议在移植前进行LRT,但由于缺乏前瞻性设计研究,证据水平通常较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号