...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >vs proton pump inhibitors for laryngopharyngeal reflux based on pH-monitoring and symptom-scale
【24h】

vs proton pump inhibitors for laryngopharyngeal reflux based on pH-monitoring and symptom-scale

机译:vs pH监测和症状量表的质子泵抑制剂对咽喉返流的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

AIMTo compare the outcomes between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and type I hiatal hernia diagnosed by oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and symptom-scale assessment. METHODSFrom February 2014 to January 2015, 70 patients who were diagnosed with LPR and type I hiatal hernia and referred for symptomatic assessment, oropharyngeal pH-monitoring, manometry, and gastrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled in this study. All of the patients met the inclusion criteria. All of the patients underwent LNF or PPIs administration, and completed a 2-year follow-up. Patients’ baseline characteristics and primary outcome measures, including comprehensive and single symptoms of LPR, PPIs independence, and satisfaction, and postoperative complications were assessed. The outcomes of LNF and PPIs therapy were analyzed and compared. RESULTSThere were 31 patients in the LNF group and 39 patients in the PPI group. Fifty-three patients (25 in the LNF group and 28 in the PPI group) completed reviews and follow-up. Oropharyngeal pH-monitoring parameters were all abnormal with high acid exposure, a large amount of reflux, and a high Ryan score, associated reflux symptom index (RSI) score. There was a significant improvement in the RSI and LPR symptom scores after the 2-year follow-up in both groups (P P P = 0.032), mucus (P = 0.011), and throat clearing (P = 0.022) was significantly superior in the LNF group to that in the PPI group. After LNF and PPIs therapy, 13 and 53 patients achieved independence from PPIs therapy (LNF: 44.0% vs PPI: 7.14%, P vs PPI: 44.36 ± 32.77, P = 0.004). Body mass index was significantly lower in the LNF group than in the PPI group (LNF: 22.2 ± 3.1 kg/m2vs PPI: 25.1 ± 2.9 kg/m2, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONDiagnosis of LPR should be assessed with oropharyngeal pH-monitoring, manometry, and the symptom-scale. LNF achieves better improvement than PPIs for LPR with type I hiatal hernia.
机译:目的比较经口咽pH监测和症状量表评估诊断为喉咽反流(LPR)和I型食管裂孔疝的患者的腹腔镜尼森胃底折叠术(LNF)和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗的结果。方法2014年2月至2015年1月,本研究纳入了70例经诊断为LPR和I型裂孔疝的患者,并对其进行了症状评估,口咽pH监测,测压和胃肠道内窥镜检查。所有患者均符合纳入标准。所有患者均接受LNF或PPI给药,并完成了2年的随访。评估患者的基线特征和主要结局指标,包括LPR的全面和单一症状,PPI独立性和满意度以及术后并发症。对LNF和PPIs治疗的结果进行了分析和比较。结果LNF组31例,PPI组39例。 53例患者(LNF组25例,PPI组28例)完成了复查和随访。口咽pH监测参数均异常,存在高酸暴露,大量反流和高Ryan评分以及相关的反流症状指数(RSI)评分。两组(PPP = 0.032),粘液(P = 0.011)和2年随访后,RSI和LPR症状评分均有显着改善,LNF的喉咙清扫(P = 0.022)显着改善。分组到PPI组中的分组。 LNF和PPI治疗后,有13例和53例患者独立于PPI治疗(LNF:44.0%vs PPI:7.14%,P vs PPI:44.36±32.77,P = 0.004)。 LNF组的体重指数显着低于PPI组(LNF:22.2±3.1 kg / m 2 vs PPI:25.1±2.9 kg / m 2 , P = 0.001)。结论LPR的诊断应通过口咽pH监测,测压和症状量表进行评估。对于I型食管裂孔疝,LNF的改善优于PPI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号