...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Can optical diagnosis of small colon polyps be accurate? Comparing standard scope without narrow banding to high definition scope with narrow banding
【24h】

Can optical diagnosis of small colon polyps be accurate? Comparing standard scope without narrow banding to high definition scope with narrow banding

机译:小结肠息肉的光学诊断能准确吗?将没有窄带的标准范围与带窄带的高清晰度范围进行比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AIM : To study the accuracy of using high definition (HD) scope with narrow band imaging (NBI) vs standard white light colonoscope without NBI (ST), to predict the histology of the colon polyps, particularly those < 1 cm. METHODS : A total of 147 African Americans patients who were referred to Howard University Hospital for screening or, diagnostic or follow up colonoscopy, during a 12-mo period in 2012 were prospectively recruited. Some patients had multiple polyps and total number of polyps was 179. Their colonoscopies were performed by 3 experienced endoscopists who determined the size and stated whether the polyps being removed were hyperplastic or adenomatous polyps using standard colonoscopes or high definition colonoscopes with NBI. The histopathologic diagnosis was reported by pathologists as part of routine care. RESULTS : Of participants in the study, 55 (37%) were male and median (interquartile range) of age was 56 (19-80). Demographic, clinical characteristics, past medical history of patients, and the data obtained by two instruments were not significantly different and two methods detected similar number of polyps. In ST scope 89% of polyps were < 1 cm vs 87% in HD scope ( P = 0.7). The ST scope had a positive predictive value (PPV) and positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 86% and 4.0 for adenoma compared to 74% and 2.6 for HD scope. There was a trend of higher sensitivity for HD scope (68%) compare to ST scope (53%) with almost the same specificity. The ST scope had a PPV and PLR of 38% and 1.8 for hyperplastic polyp (HPP) compared to 42% and 2.2 for HD scope. The sensitivity and specificity of two instruments for HPP diagnosis were similar. CONCLUSION : Our results indicated that HD scope was more sensitive in diagnosis of adenoma than ST scope. Clinical diagnosis of HPP with either scope is less accurate compared to adenoma. Colonoscopy diagnosis is not yet fully matched with pathologic diagnosis of colon polyp. However with the advancement of both imaging and training, it may be possible to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the scopes and hence save money for eliminating time and the cost of Immunohistochemistry/pathology.
机译:目的:研究使用窄带成像(NBI)的高清(HD)示波器与不带NBI(ST)的标准白光结肠镜的准确性,以预测结肠息肉的组织学,尤其是<1 cm的息肉。方法:2012年12月期间,共招募了147名非洲裔美国人患者,这些患者被转入霍华德大学医院进行筛查,诊断或随访结肠镜检查。一些患者有多个息肉,息肉总数为179。他们的结肠镜检查是由3名经验丰富的内镜医师进行的,他们确定了大小,并使用标准结肠镜或带有NBI的高清结肠镜检查了被切除的息肉是增生性息肉还是腺瘤性息肉。病理学家报告组织病理学诊断为常规护理的一部分。结果:在研究参与者中,有55名(37%)是男性,中位年龄(四分位间距)为56岁(19-80岁)。人口统计学,临床特征,患者的既往病史以及通过两种仪器获得的数据没有显着差异,并且两种方法检测到的息肉数量相似。在ST范围内,息肉的1%<1 cm小于HD范围的87%(P = 0.7)。 ST范围对腺瘤的阳性预测值(PPV)和阳性似然比(PLR)分别为86%和4.0,而HD范围则为74%和2.6。 HD范围(68%)的敏感性高于ST范围(53%),具有几乎相同的特异性。对于增生性息肉(HPP),ST镜的PPV和PLR分别为38%和1.8,而HD镜的PPV和PLR为42%和2.2。两种用于HPP诊断的仪器的敏感性和特异性相似。结论:我们的结果表明,HD镜对腺瘤的诊断比ST镜更为敏感。与腺瘤相比,任一范围的HPP的临床诊断准确性均较差。结肠镜检查与结肠息肉的病理诊断尚未完全匹配。然而,随着成像和训练的发展,有可能增加范围的敏感性和特异性,并因此节省用于消除时间和免疫组织化学/病理学成本的金钱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号