...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia Computer Science >A Comparative Study of Software Development Size Estimation Method: UCPabc vs Function Points
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Software Development Size Estimation Method: UCPabc vs Function Points

机译:UCPabc与功能点的软件开发规模估算方法的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

One of the stages in planning software development projects is to estimate the effort and cost. The good news is, there are already studies related to the estimated cost of software development projects whose results are close to the real cost. In this study, we compared two cost estimation methods which have quite small deviations, such Use Case Points - Activity Based Costing models (then namely UCPabc) and Function Points (FP). Some aspects that were compared are process and parameters, complexity factors, and deviation. The results of this research are, first, the difference of process algorithm and parameters. Secondly, there were differences in complexity factors, 21 factors on UCPabc model and 14 factors on FP method. So, the deviation between two methods of effort estimation toward actual effort was 11.9 percent using UCPabc and 27.8 percent using FP. Therefore, the UCPabc method is the closest method of effort estimation toward actual effort.
机译:计划软件开发项目的阶段之一是估算工作量和成本。好消息是,已经有一些与软件开发项目的估计成本相关的研究,其结果接近于实际成本。在本研究中,我们比较了两种成本估算方法,它们具有很小的偏差,例如用例点-基于活动的成本核算模型(即UCPabc)和功能点(FP)。比较的方面包括过程和参数,复杂性因素和偏差。这项研究的结果首先是过程算法和参数的差异。其次,复杂度因子之间存在差异,UCPabc模型的复杂性因子为21个,FP方法的复杂性因子为14个。因此,使用UCPabc的两种工作量估算方法与实际工作量之间的偏差为11.9%,而使用FP则为27.8%。因此,UCPabc方法是最接近实际工作量的工作量估计方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号