【24h】

Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique

机译:使用骨水泥技术修复骨水泥骨干

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The removal of well-fixed bone cement from the femoral canal during revision of a total hip replacement (THR) can be difficult and risks the loss of excessive bone stock and perforation or fracture of the femoral shaft. Retaining the cement mantle is attractive, yet the technique of cement-in-cement revision is not widely practised. We have used this procedure at our hospital since 1989. The stems were removed to gain a better exposure for acetabular revision, to alter version or leg length, or for component incompatibility.We studied 136 hips in 134 patients and followed them up for a mean of eight years (5 to 15). A further revision was required in 35 hips (25.7%), for acetabular loosening in 26 (19.1%), sepsis in four, instability in three, femoral fracture in one and stem fracture in one. No femoral stem needed to be re-revised for aseptic loosening.A cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem is a reliable technique in the medium term. It also reduces the risk of perforation or fracture of the femoral shaft.
机译:在全髋关节置换术(THR)的翻修过程中,很难从股骨管中取出固定良好的骨水泥,并且可能会失去骨量过多以及股骨干穿孔或骨折的风险。固结水泥地幔是有吸引力的,但水泥固井改型技术并未得到广泛应用。自1989年以来,我们就一直在我们的医院使用此程序。为了更好地暴露髋臼,改变髋臼版本或腿长或部件不兼容,将茎切除了。我们对134例患者的136髋进行了研究,并对其进行平均随访。八年(5至15年)。需要进一步修订35髋(25.7%),髋臼松弛26例(19.1%),败血症4例,不稳定3例,股骨骨折1例,茎干骨折1例。无需重新修订股骨干以进行无菌性松动。在中期,用水泥骨水泥固定股骨干是一种可靠的技术。它还降低了股骨干穿孔或骨折的风险。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号