首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British VolumecBritish Orthopaedic Association , Australian Orthopaedic Association , Canadian Orthopaedic Association . . . [et al] >A prospective randomised trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur
【24h】

A prospective randomised trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur

机译:内固定与人工关节置换治疗股骨颈移位性骨折的前瞻性随机试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It remains a matter of debate whether displaced fractures of the neck of the femur should be treated by internal fixation or arthroplasty. We have compared the two methods with regard to complications, mortality and functional outcome.We studied 409 patients, aged 70 years and over, with subcapital fractures graded as Garden 3 or 4, in a two-year prospective multicentre study from 12 Swedish hospitals. They were randomised to internal fixation or arthroplasty. Patients who were mentally confused, bedridden or in a nursing-home were excluded from the survey.After two years the rate of failure was 43% in the internal fixation (IF) and 6% in the arthroplasty group (p < 0.001). In the IF group 36% had impaired walking and 6% had severe pain compared with 25% and 1.5%, respectively, in the arthroplasty group (both p < 0.05). There was no difference in mortality.With a high rate of failure and poor functional outcome after IF, we recommend primary arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur in patients over 70 years of age.
机译:股骨颈移位后的骨折是否应通过内固定或关节置换术治疗尚有争议。我们对这两种方法的并发症,死亡率和功能结局进行了比较。在一项来自瑞典12家医院的为期两年的多中心前瞻性研究中,我们研究了409名年龄在70岁及以上的亚下骨折为3或4级花园的患者。他们被随机分为内固定或关节置换术。精神错乱,卧床不起或在疗养院中的患者被排除在调查之外。两年后,内固定(IF)的失败率为43%,人工关节置换组的失败率为6%(p <0.001)。在IF组中,有36%的人有行走障碍,有6%的人有严重疼痛,而在关节成形术组中分别为25%和1.5%(均p <0.05)。死亡率无差异.IF术后失败率高且功能预后差,我们建议对70岁以上的患者股骨颈移位性骨折进行一次人工关节置换。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号