...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of immunology >Comparative Studies of Infusion and Infusion-Free Diphtheria Toxin in Antitoxin Production and in Standardization by the Flocculation, Subcutaneous, and Intracutaneous Tests
【24h】

Comparative Studies of Infusion and Infusion-Free Diphtheria Toxin in Antitoxin Production and in Standardization by the Flocculation, Subcutaneous, and Intracutaneous Tests

机译:通过絮凝,皮下和皮内试验对抗毒素产生和标准化中的输注和免输白喉毒素的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The practical application to routine and experimental purposes of diphtheria toxin produced with an infusion-free peptone medium is reported. The procedures followed in the routine preparation of the medium and toxin are given in some detail. The marked reduction in cost of production of the toxin as compared with that of meat-infusion toxin, and the greater uniformity in the potency obtained are pointed out.Results of comparative studies of the flocculation-reaction test are recorded. The infusion-free toxin was found to be at least as satisfactory as the infusion toxin, in these tests. The micrometer-syringe method proved less accurate than the “pipette method” in which larger volumes of toxin are measured for the test.A comparison of the flocculation-reaction test with the subcutaneous and the intracutaneous animal method for determining diphtheria antitoxic values showed closer agreement with the subcutaneous test. Variation was less than 10 per cent with the subcutaneous and nearly 20 per cent with the intracutaneous method. In titrations of sera from certain horses, especially during the early stages of immunization, wide variations were noted between the results of the flocculation and subcutaneous tests on the one hand and those of the intracutaneous test on the other. The flocculation reaction was found to be a satisfactory method for the approximate estimation of the unit content of concentrated antitoxins. The flocculation test was used to determine the time at which optimum antitoxic titer might be expected in the serum of horses immunized against the infusion-free toxin by different methods.The value of the toxin as an antigen was also studied in a series of twelve horses. The results demonstrated that the infusion-free toxin is equal to, if not better than, meat-infusion toxins in the routine immunization of horses for diphtheria antitoxin production. Three horses given injections of purified (ultrafiltered) infusion-free peptone toxin appeared to respond as well as horses receiving other toxins and possibly with less disturbance of the normal metabolic processes. Further studies are in progress.The chief points which are brought out by this investigation may be enumerated as follows: 1. 1. Diphtheria toxin of uniformly high potency has been produced in infusion-free peptone medium on a routine basis for a period of nearly two years.2. 2. The infusion-free toxin compares in all respects very favorably with routine infusion toxin for the immunization of horses in the production of diphtheria antitoxin.3. 3. This toxin has also been used extensively in comparative flocculation-reaction tests and found in all respects to compare favorably with the infusion toxin.4. 4. The flocculation-reaction test for standardization of diphtheria antitoxin proved more accurate when relatively large volumes were measured by pipettes than when the micrometer-syringe method was used.5. 5. Closer agreement was found between the flocculation-reaction-test and the subcutaneous animal method for the determination of antitoxic content than between the flocculation and the intracutaneous animal test, or between the subcutaneous and the intracutaneous test.6. 6. The flocculation-reaction test was satisfactory for preliminary estimations of the antitoxin content of the concentrated as well as of the untreated serum.7. 7. Besides its other advantages, the great saving in production cost as compared with the usual meat-infusion toxin makes the infusion-free peptone toxin an important economic factor where large amounts of toxin are required for the production of diphtheria antitoxin, for standardization, and possibly also, for the active immunization of persons with toxoid.
机译:报告了用无输注蛋白ept培养基生产的白喉毒素在常规和实验目的上的实际应用。详细介绍了常规制备培养基和毒素所遵循的程序。指出与肉浸制毒素相比,该毒素的生产成本显着降低,并且获得的效价更均匀。记录了絮凝反应试验的比较研究结果。在这些测试中,发现无输液毒素至少与输液毒素一样令人满意。经证明,千分尺注射器法比“移液管法”的准确性要低,后者需要量较大的毒素量。絮凝反应试验与皮下和皮内动物法测定白喉抗毒性值的比较显示出更接近的一致性。用皮下测试。皮下方法的变化小于10%,皮内方法的变化近20%。在某些马的血清滴定中,尤其是在免疫的早期阶段,一方面在絮凝和皮下测试的结果与另一方面在皮内测试的结果之间发现了很大的差异。发现絮凝反应是用于估计浓缩抗毒素的单位含量的令人满意的方法。通过絮凝试验确定用不同方法对无输注毒素免疫的马的血清中预期最佳抗毒滴度的时间。还对十二只马中的毒素作为抗原的价值进行了研究。结果表明,在对白喉抗毒素生产进行常规免疫的常规免疫中,无输注毒素等于或优于肉类输注毒素。注射纯净(超滤)无注射蛋白one毒素的三匹马似乎反应良好,而接受其他毒素的马似乎对正常代谢过程的干扰较小。正在进行的进一步研究。可以列举出本研究的要点如下:1. 1.在常规的基础上,在无输注蛋白ept培养基中常规生产了具有相同效力的白喉毒素。两年2。 2.在白喉抗毒素生产中,无注射毒素在各个方面都比常规的注射毒素更有利于马的免疫。3。 3.该毒素也已在比较絮凝反应试验中广泛使用,并在各个方面均与输液毒素相媲美。4。 4.用移液管测量相对较大体积的絮凝反应试验证明白喉抗毒素比使用千分尺注射器法更准确。5。 5.在絮凝反应试验和皮下动物方法测定抗毒性含量之间的一致性比在絮凝和皮内动物试验之间或在皮下和皮内试验之间更一致。6。 6.絮凝反应试验对浓缩液和未经处理的血清中抗毒素含量的初步估计是令人满意的。7。 7.除其他优点外,与通常的肉类输注毒素相比,节省了生产成本,这使得无输注蛋白p毒素成为重要的经济因素,在白喉抗毒素生产中,为了标准化,需要大量毒素,也可能用于主动免疫类毒素的人。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号