...
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian veterinary journal >Comparison of single layer staple closure versus double layer hand-sewn closure for equine pelvic flexure enterotomy
【24h】

Comparison of single layer staple closure versus double layer hand-sewn closure for equine pelvic flexure enterotomy

机译:马骨盆屈曲肠切开术单层缝合与双层缝合缝合的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Our objective was to compare thoracoabdominal (TA Premium™ 90) stapled enterotomy closure to traditional hand-sewn closure, using time to perform the technique, luminal diameter, and bursting pressure in ex-vivo specimens. The pelvic flexures of 13 client-owned horses were harvested. Each pelvic flexure had 1 enterotomy performed; 6 were closed via staples, 7 closures were hand-sewn. Luminal diameter at the enterotomy site was assessed via contrast radiography performed pre-and post-enterotomy. Bursting pressure of the closure was assessed by continuous manometry during rapid infusion. Time to perform stapled closure was significantly shorter than hand-sewn closure (P < 0.0001). Percent reduction of luminal diameters was significantly decreased in stapled specimens (P = 0.034). There was no significant difference in bursting strength between closure techniques (P = 0.196). In conclusion, stapled enterotomy closure offers statistically significant reduction in closure time and better maintains pre-enterotomy luminal diameter without reducing biomechanical strength, compared to a double layer hand-sewn closure.
机译:我们的目标是比较胸腹(TA Premium™90)吻合式肠吻合术与传统的手工缝制闭合术,使用执行该技术的时间,管腔直径和活体标本中的破裂压力。收集了13个客户拥有的马的骨盆弯曲。每个骨盆弯曲均进行了1次肠切开术。 6个通过钉书钉闭合,7个通过手工缝制。肠切开术部位在术前和术后通过造影造影评估肠切开术部位的管腔直径。通过在快速输注过程中连续测压来评估闭合件的破裂压力。进行吻合钉缝合的时间明显短于手工缝合钉闭合的时间(P <0.0001)。在装订的标本中,管腔直径的减小百分比显着降低(P = 0.034)。封闭技术之间的破裂强度没有显着差异(P = 0.196)。总之,与双层手缝闭合相比,吻合钉肠吻合术在闭合时间上有统计学意义的减少,并在不降低生物力学强度的情况下更好地保持了肠胃切开术前的管腔直径。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号