...
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian veterinary journal >A comparison of electroejaculation and epididymal sperm collection techniques in stallions
【24h】

A comparison of electroejaculation and epididymal sperm collection techniques in stallions

机译:种马电射精和附睾精子收集技术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate 2 methods of semen collection that could be used as terminal procedures in stallions with irreparable conditions, such as fractures or colic. Electroejaculation was attempted under general anesthesia. Forty-eight hours later, the ponies were castrated and 2 different epididymal sperm collection techniques were attempted by using a flushing or floating method. Additionally, the effect of supplemental seminal plasma was evaluated. Experimentally, electroejaculation was found to be a safe but ineffective method of terminal semen collection. Viable sperm cells were successfully recovered with both types of epididymal collection. The flotation method was least cumbersome and showed a tendency to be superior to flushing in terms of sperm motility and percentage of cells passing through glass wool/sephadex filtration, although differences did not reach significance. The addition of seminal plasma to epididymal spermatozoa prior to cryopreservation was of no value. In conclusion, either method of epididymal sperm collection is an acceptable method of terminal semen collection.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估两种精液收集方法,这些方法可用于条件不可修复的种马(如骨折或绞痛)的终末程序。尝试在全身麻醉下进行电射精。 48小时后,将小马去势,并尝试使用冲洗或漂浮方法尝试两种不同的附睾精子收集技术。另外,评估了补充精浆的效果。在实验上,发现电射精是收集精液的安全但无效的方法。两种附睾收集都成功地回收了活精子细胞。浮选方法最不麻烦,并且在精子活力和通过玻璃棉/葡聚糖过滤的细胞百分比方面显示出优于冲洗的趋势,尽管差异没有显着性。冷冻保存之前在附睾精子中添加精浆没有任何价值。总之,附睾精子收集的任何一种方法是末期精液收集的可接受方法。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号