首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >UPDATED KINEMATIC CONSTRAINTS ON A DARK DISK
【24h】

UPDATED KINEMATIC CONSTRAINTS ON A DARK DISK

机译:黑暗碟中更新的运动约束

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We update the method of the Holmberg & Flynn study, including an updated model of the Milky Way's interstellar gas, radial velocities, an updated reddening map, and a careful statistical analysis, to bound the allowed surface density and scale height of a dark disk. We pay careful attention to the self-consistency of the model, including the gravitational influence of the dark disk on other disk components, and to the net velocity of the tracer stars. We find that the data set exhibits a non-zero bulk velocity in the vertical direction as well as a displacement from the expected location at the Galactic midplane. If not properly accounted for, these features would bias the bound toward low dark disk mass. We therefore perform our analysis two ways. In the first, using the traditional method, we subtract the mean velocity and displacement from the tracers' phase space distributions. In the second method, we perform a non-equilibrium version of the HF method to derive a bound on the dark disk parameters for an oscillating tracer distribution. Despite updates in the mass model and reddening map, the traditional method results remain consistent with those of HF2000. The second, non-equilibrium technique, however, allows a surface density as large as (and as small as ), demonstrating much weaker constraints. For both techniques, the bound on surface density is weaker for larger scale height. In future analyses of Gaia data it will be important to verify whether the tracer populations are in equilibrium.
机译:我们更新了Holmberg&Flynn研究的方法,包括银河系星际气体的更新模型,径向速度,更新的变红图和仔细的统计分析,以限制暗盘的允许表面密度和刻度高度。我们要特别注意模型的自洽性,包括暗盘对其他盘成分的引力影响以及示踪星的净速度。我们发现该数据集在垂直方向上显示出非零的体速度,并且距银河系中平面的预期位置有一定的位移。如果没有适当考虑,这些功能将使边界偏向于低暗盘质量。因此,我们以两种方式执行分析。首先,使用传统方法,从示踪剂的相空间分布中减去平均速度和位移。在第二种方法中,我们执行HF方法的非平衡版本,以导出暗盘参数的界线,用于振荡示踪剂分布。尽管质量模型和变红图有所更新,但传统方法的结果仍与HF2000一致。但是,第二种非平衡技术允许使用与(一样小)一样大的表面密度,这表明约束要弱得多。对于这两种技术,对于较大的标度高度,表面密度的边界都较弱。在未来的Gaia数据分析中,验证示踪剂种群是否处于平衡状态将非常重要。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号