...
首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >TRANSIENT GALACTIC COSMIC-RAY MODULATION DURING SOLAR CYCLE 24: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO PROMINENT FORBUSH DECREASE EVENTS
【24h】

TRANSIENT GALACTIC COSMIC-RAY MODULATION DURING SOLAR CYCLE 24: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO PROMINENT FORBUSH DECREASE EVENTS

机译:太阳周期24的瞬态银河宇宙射线调制:两个突出的前期下降事件的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Forbush decrease (FD) events are of great interest for transient galactic cosmic-ray (GCR) modulation study. In this study, we perform comparative analysis of two prominent Forbush events during cycle 24, occurring on 2012 March 8 (Event 1) and 2015 June 22 (Event 2), utilizing the measurements from the worldwide neutron monitor (NM) network. Despite?their comparable magnitudes, the two Forbush events are distinctly different in terms of evolving GCR energy spectrum and energy dependence of the recovery time. The recovery time of Event 1 is strongly dependent on the median energy, compared to the nearly constant recovery time of Event 2 over the studied energy range. Additionally, while the evolutions of the energy spectra during the two FD events exhibit similar variation patterns, the spectrum of Event 2 is significantly harder, especially at the time of deepest depression. These difference are essentially related to their associated solar wind disturbances. Event 1 is associated with a complicated shock-associated interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) disturbance with large radial extent, probably formed by the merging of multiple shocks and transient flows, and which delivered a glancing blow to Earth. Conversely, Event 2 is accompanied by a relatively simple halo ICME with small radial extent that hit Earth more head-on.
机译:对于瞬态星系宇宙射线(GCR)调制研究,前冲减少(FD)事件引起了人们的极大兴趣。在这项研究中,我们利用来自全球中子监测器(NM)网络的测量结果,对第24周期发生在2012年3月8日(事件1)和2015年6月22日(事件2)的两个重要Forbush事件进行了比较分析。尽管它们的震级相当,但两次Gush能动事件在GCR能谱的演化和恢复时间对能量的依赖性方面截然不同。与事件2在研究的能量范围内几乎恒定的恢复时间相比,事件1的恢复时间在很大程度上取决于中值能量。此外,尽管两个FD事件期间的能谱演化表现出相似的变化模式,但事件2的光谱却要困难得多,尤其是在最深的凹陷时。这些差异本质上与它们相关的太阳风干扰有关。事件1与大范围径向范围内的复杂的与冲击有关的行星际冠状物质抛射(ICME)扰动有关,可能是由多次冲击和瞬变流的合并形成的,并向地球传递了猛烈的打击。相反,事件2伴随着相对简单的晕轮ICME,其径向范围较小,更容易正面撞击地球。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号