...
首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >TESTING MODEL ATMOSPHERES FOR YOUNG VERY-LOW-MASS STARS AND BROWN DWARFS IN THE INFRARED: EVIDENCE FOR SIGNIFICANTLY UNDERESTIMATED DUST OPACITIES
【24h】

TESTING MODEL ATMOSPHERES FOR YOUNG VERY-LOW-MASS STARS AND BROWN DWARFS IN THE INFRARED: EVIDENCE FOR SIGNIFICANTLY UNDERESTIMATED DUST OPACITIES

机译:在红外中测试极低质量恒星和棕矮星的模型大气:证据表明尘埃潜力明显低估

获取原文

摘要

We test state-of-the-art model atmospheres for young very-low-mass stars and brown dwarfs in the infrared, by comparing the predicted synthetic photometry over 1.2–24 μm to the observed photometry of M-type spectral templates in star-forming regions. We find that (1) in both early and late young M types, the model atmospheres imply effective temperatures () several hundred Kelvin lower than predicted by the standard pre-main sequence (PMS) spectral type– conversion scale (based on theoretical evolutionary models). It is only in the mid-M types that the two temperature estimates agree. (2) The discrepancy in the early M types (corresponding to stellar masses ??at ages of a few Myr) probably arises from remaining uncertainties in the treatment of atmospheric convection within the atmospheric models, whereas in the late M types it is likely due to an underestimation of dust opacity. (3) The empirical and model-atmosphere J-band bolometric corrections are both roughly flat, and similar to each other, over the M-type range. Thus the model atmospheres yield reasonably accurate bolometric luminosities (), but lead to underestimations of mass and age relative to evolutionary expectations (especially in the late M types) due to lower . We demonstrate this for a large sample of young Cha I and Taurus sources. (4) The trends in the atmospheric model J?Ks colors, and their deviations from the data, are similar at PMS and main sequence ages, suggesting that the model dust opacity errors we postulate here for young ages also apply at field ages.
机译:通过比较1.2–24μm范围内的预测合成光度与星型M型光谱模板的观测光度,我们测试了红外中极低质量年轻恒星和褐矮星的最新模型大气。形成区域。我们发现(1)在早期M型和晚期M型中,模型大气均暗示有效温度()比标准主前序列(PMS)光谱类型–转换尺度(基于理论演化模型)的预测低数百开尔文)。两种温度估计值仅在中型温度类型中一致。 (2)早期M型(对应于几Myr年龄的恒星质量)的差异可能是由于大气模型中大气对流的处理仍存在不确定性,而在晚期M型中则可能是由于低估了灰尘的不透明度。 (3)在M型范围内,经验和模型大气J波段辐射热校正都大致平坦,并且彼此相似。因此,模型大气产生了相当准确的辐射热亮度(),但由于较低,导致相对于进化预期(尤其是M型晚期)相对于质量和年龄低估了质量。我们通过大量的Cha I和Taurus原始资料来证明这一点。 (4)在PMS和主要序列年龄,大气模型J?Ks颜色的趋势及其与数据的偏差相似,这表明我们在此处假设的年轻年龄模型尘埃不透明度误差也适用于田间年龄。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号