...
首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >A COMPARISON OF COSMOLOGICAL MODELS USING STRONG GRAVITATIONAL LENSING GALAXIES
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF COSMOLOGICAL MODELS USING STRONG GRAVITATIONAL LENSING GALAXIES

机译:强引力星系的宇宙学模式比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Strongly gravitationally lensed quasar-galaxy systems allow us to compare competing cosmologies as long as one can be reasonably sure of the mass distribution within the intervening lens. In this paper, we assemble a catalog of 69 such systems from the Sloan Lens ACS and Lens Structure and Dynamics surveys suitable for this analysis, and carry out a one-on-one comparison between the standard model, ΛCDM, and the universe, which has thus far been favored by the application of model selection tools to other kinds of data. We find that both models account for the lens observations quite well, though the precision of these measurements does not appear to be good enough to favor one model over the other. Part of the reason is the so-called bulge-halo conspiracy that, on average, results in a baryonic velocity dispersion within a fraction of the optical effective radius virtually identical to that expected for the whole luminous-dark matter distribution modeled as a singular isothermal ellipsoid, though with some scatter among individual sources. Future work can greatly improve the precision of these measurements by focusing on lensing systems with galaxies as close as possible to the background sources. Given the limitations of doing precision cosmological testing using the current sample, we also carry out Monte Carlo simulations based on the current lens measurements to estimate how large the source catalog would have to be in order to rule out either model at a confidence level. We find that if the real cosmology is ΛCDM, a sample of strong gravitational lenses would be sufficient to rule out at this level of accuracy, while strong gravitational lenses would be required to rule out ΛCDM if the real universe were instead . The difference in required sample size reflects the greater number of free parameters available to fit the data with ΛCDM. We point out that, should the universe eventually emerge as the correct cosmology, its lack of any free parameters for this kind of work will provide a remarkably powerful probe of the mass structure in lensing galaxies, and a means of better understanding the origin of the bulge-halo conspiracy.
机译:强重力透镜拟星系系统使我们能够比较竞争的宇宙学,只要可以合理确定中间透镜内的质量分布即可。在本文中,我们从Sloan Lens ACS和“镜头结构与动力学”调查中收集了适合此类分析的69种此类系统的目录,并对标准模型ΛCDM和宇宙进行了一对一比较,从而得出到目前为止,模型选择工具在其他类型的数据中的应用受到青睐。我们发现这两个模型都很好地说明了镜头的观测结果,尽管这些测量的精度似乎不足以使一个模型优于另一个模型。部分原因是所谓的“凸起-晕圈”阴谋,该阴谋平均会导致在光学有效半径的一小部分内产生重子速度色散,其实际上与建模为奇异等温的整个发光-暗物质分布所预期的相同椭圆形,尽管在各个来源之间散布着一些。未来的工作将重点放在具有尽可能靠近背景源的星系透镜系统上,从而可以大大提高这些测量的精度。鉴于使用当前样本进行精密宇宙学测试的局限性,我们还基于当前的镜头测量值进行了蒙特卡洛模拟,以估计为了排除置信水平中的任何一个模型,源目录必须有多大。我们发现,如果真实的宇宙学是ΛCDM,那么一个强引力透镜的样本就足以在这个精度水平上排除,而如果是真实的宇宙,那么就需要强引力透镜来排除ΛCDM。所需样本量的差异反映了可用自由参数数量更多以适合ΛCDM的数据。我们指出,如果宇宙最终以正确的宇宙学出现,那么它缺乏此类工作的任何自由参数,将为透镜星系的质量结构提供非常有力的探索,并为更好地理解宇宙起源提供一种手段。凸起晕轮阴谋。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号