首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE COMBINED STRONG AND WEAK LENSING ANALYSIS OF THE CLASH SAMPLE: MASS AND MAGNIFICATION MODELS AND SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES
【24h】

HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE COMBINED STRONG AND WEAK LENSING ANALYSIS OF THE CLASH SAMPLE: MASS AND MAGNIFICATION MODELS AND SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES

机译:碰撞样本的望远镜空间望远镜强弱联合分析:质量,放大率模型和系统不确定性

获取原文
           

摘要

We present results from a comprehensive lensing analysis in Hubble Space Telescope (HST) data of the complete Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble cluster sample. We identify previously undiscovered multiple images, allowing improved or first constraints on the cluster inner mass distributions and profiles. We combine these strong lensing constraints with weak lensing shape measurements within the HST field of view (FOV) to jointly constrain the mass distributions. The analysis is performed in two different common parameterizations (one adopts light-traces-mass for both galaxies and dark matter while the other adopts an analytical, elliptical Navarro-Frenk-White form for the dark matter) to provide a better assessment of the underlying systematics—which is most important for deep, cluster-lensing surveys, especially when studying magnified high-redshift objects. We find that the typical (median), relative systematic differences throughout the central FOV are ~40% in the (dimensionless) mass density, κ, and ~20% in the magnification, μ. We show maps of these differences for each cluster, as well as the mass distributions, critical curves, and two-dimensional (2D)-integrated mass profiles. For the Einstein radii (zs = 2) we find that all typically agree within 10% between the two models, and Einstein masses agree, typically, within ~15%. At larger radii, the total projected, 2D-integrated mass profiles of the two models, within r ~ 2', differ by ~30%. Stacking the surface-density profiles of the sample from the two methods together, we obtain an average slope of dlog (Σ)/dlog (r) ~ –0.64 ± 0.1, in the radial range [5350] kpc. Last, we also characterize the behavior of the average magnification, surface density, and shear differences between the two models as a function of both the radius from the center and the best-fit values of these quantities. All mass models and magnification maps are made publicly available for the community.
机译:我们介绍了在哈勃太空望远镜(HST)数据中对哈勃星团样本进行的完整星团透镜和超新星调查的全面透镜分析结果。我们确定以前未发现的多个图像,从而对群集内部质量分布和轮廓进行了改进或优先约束。我们将这些强的透镜约束条件与HST视场(FOV)内的弱透镜形状测量结果结合起来,共同约束质量分布。该分析以两种不同的常用参数设置进行(一种针对星系和暗物质采用光迹质量,另一种针对暗物质采用解析椭圆形的纳瓦罗·弗兰克·怀特形式),以便对下层物质进行更好的评估系统的-对深层,群集镜头的调查尤其重要,尤其是在研究放大的高红移对象时。我们发现,整个中央视场的典型(中位数)相对系统差异在(无量纲)质量密度κ中约为40%,在放大率μ中约为20%。我们显示了每个群集的这些差异的图,以及质量分布,临界曲线和二维(2D)积分质量分布图。对于爱因斯坦半径(zs = 2),我们发现两个模型之间的平均值通常都在10%之内,而爱因斯坦质量的平均值通常在15%之内。在较大的半径处,两个模型在r〜2'范围内的总投影,二维积分质量分布相差〜30%。通过两种方法将样品的表面密度分布叠加在一起,我们在径向范围[5350] kpc中获得了dlog(Σ)/ dlog(r)〜–0.64±0.1的平均斜率。最后,我们还将两个模型之间的平均放大倍率,表面密度和剪切差的行为描述为距中心半径和这些量的最佳拟合值的函数。所有大众模型和放大图均向社区公开提供。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号