...
首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >THE ELECTRON TEMPERATURE OF THE SOLAR TRANSITION REGION AS DERIVED FROM EIS AND SUMER
【24h】

THE ELECTRON TEMPERATURE OF THE SOLAR TRANSITION REGION AS DERIVED FROM EIS AND SUMER

机译:从EIS和SUMER推导的太阳跃迁区的电子温度

获取原文
           

摘要

We use UV and extreme-UV emission lines observed in quiet regions on the solar disk with the Solar Ultraviolet Measurements of Emitted Radiation (SUMER) instrument and the Extreme Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrometer (EIS) to determine the electron temperature in solar transition region plasmas. Prominent emission lines of O IV and O VI are present in the solar spectrum, and the measured intensity line ratios provide electron temperatures in the range of log T = 5.6-6.1. We find that the theoretical O IV and O VI ion formation temperatures are considerably lower than our derived temperatures. The line ratios expected from a plasma in ionization equilibrium are larger by a factor of about 2-5 than the measured line ratios. A careful cross-calibration of SUMER and EIS has been carried out, which excludes errors in the relative calibration of the two instruments. We checked for other instrumental and observational effects, as well as line blending, and can exclude them as a possible source of the discrepancy between theoretical and observed line ratios. Using a multi-thermal quiet-Sun differential emission measure changes the theoretical line ratio by up to 28% which is not sufficient as an explanation. We also explored additional excitation mechanisms. Photoexcitation from photospheric blackbody radiation, self-absorption, and recombination into excited levels cannot be a possible solution. Adding a second Maxwellian to simulate the presence of non-thermal, high-energy electrons in the plasma distribution of velocities also did not solve the discrepancy.
机译:我们使用太阳圆盘上的安静区域中观察到的UV和极端UV发射线,通过太阳紫外线发射光谱仪(SUMER)和极端紫外线成像光谱仪(EIS)来确定太阳过渡区等离子体中的电子温度。太阳光谱中存在明显的O IV和O VI发射线,并且测得的强度线比可提供log T = 5.6-6.1范围内的电子温度。我们发现理论上的O IV和O VI离子形成温度大大低于我们得出的温度。从电离平衡中的等离子体预期的线比比测得的线比大约2-5倍。已对SUMER和EIS进行了仔细的交叉校准,这排除了这两种仪器的相对校准中的错误。我们检查了其他乐器和观察效果以及线融合,并可以将它们排除为理论线比与观察线比之间差异的可能来源。使用多热安静-太阳差分发射量度可以将理论线比率最多更改28%,这还不足以说明问题。我们还探讨了其他激励机制。来自光球黑体辐射,自吸收以及重组为激发能级的光激发不可能是解决方案。添加第二个Maxwellian来模拟速度等离子体分布中非热,高能电子的存在也无法解决差异。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号