...
首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >ARE DECAYING MAGNETIC FIELDS ABOVE ACTIVE REGIONS RELATED TO CORONAL MASS EJECTION ONSET?
【24h】

ARE DECAYING MAGNETIC FIELDS ABOVE ACTIVE REGIONS RELATED TO CORONAL MASS EJECTION ONSET?

机译:衰变磁场是否在与冠状动脉大量退出有关的活动区域上?

获取原文

摘要

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are powered by magnetic energy stored in non-potential (current-carrying) coronal magnetic fields, with the pre-CME field in balance between outward magnetic pressure of the proto-ejecta and inward magnetic tension from overlying fields that confine the proto-ejecta. In studies of global potential (current-free) models of coronal magnetic fields—Potential Field Source Surface (PFSS) models—it has been reported that model field strengths above flare sites tend to be weaker when CMEs occur than when eruptions fail to occur. This suggests that potential field models might be useful to quantify magnetic confinement. One straightforward implication of this idea is that a decrease in model field strength overlying a possible eruption site should correspond to diminished confinement, implying an eruption is more likely. We have searched for such an effect by post facto investigation of the time evolution of model field strengths above a sample of 10 eruption sites. To check if the strengths of overlying fields were relevant only in relatively slow CMEs, we included both slow and fast CMEs in our sample. In most events we study, we find no statistically significant evolution in either (1)?the rate of magnetic field decay with height, (2) the strength of overlying magnetic fields near 50?Mm, or (3)?the ratio of fluxes at low and high altitudes (below 1.1 R ☉, and between 1.1 and 1.5 R ☉, respectively). We did observe a tendency for overlying field strengths and overlying flux to increase slightly, and their rates of decay with height to become slightly more gradual, consistent with increased confinement. The fact that CMEs occur regardless of whether the parameters we use to quantify confinement are increasing or decreasing suggests that either (1) the parameters that we derive from PFSS models do not accurately characterize the actual large-scale field in CME source regions, (2) systematic evolution in the large-scale magnetic environment of CME source regions is not, by itself, a necessary condition for CMEs to occur, or both.
机译:冠状物质抛射(CME)由存储在非势能(载流)冠状磁场中的磁能提供动力,前CME磁场在原型抛射体的向外磁场压力与上覆磁场的向内磁场张力之间保持平衡限制原射出物。在对全球潜在(无电流)的冠状磁场模型(势场源表面(PFSS)模型)的研究中,据报道,发生CME时,耀斑上方的模型场强往往比未发生爆发时弱。这表明势场模型可能有助于量化磁约束。这个想法的直接含义是,覆盖可能喷发部位的模型场强的降低应对应于限制作用的减弱,这意味着喷发的可能性更大。我们通过对10个喷发部位样本上方的模型场强的时间演变进行事后调查来寻找这种效果。为了检查上方场的强度是否仅在相对较慢的CME中才有意义,我们在样本中同时包括了慢CME和快速CME。在我们研究的大多数事件中,我们发现(1)磁场随高度的衰减率,(2)接近50?Mm的上覆磁场强度或(3)磁通比之比没有统计学上的显着变化。在低海拔和高海拔(分别低于1.1 R☉和1.1至1.5 R between)。我们确实观察到上覆磁场强度和上覆通量略有增加的趋势,并且随着高度的增加,它们的衰减率会逐渐变缓,这与约束的增加是一致的。无论我们用来量化限制的参数是增加还是减少,CME都会出现这一事实表明(1)我们从PFSS模型得出的参数不能准确地表征CME源区域中的实际大尺度场,(2 )CME源区域大规模磁性环境中的系统演化本身并不是CME发生的必要条件,或两者都不是。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号