...
首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >An Analysis of the Synchrotron Spectrum in the Fanaroff-Riley Type I Galaxy 3C 449
【24h】

An Analysis of the Synchrotron Spectrum in the Fanaroff-Riley Type I Galaxy 3C 449

机译:Fanaroff-Riley I型Galaxy 3C 449的同步加速器光谱分析

获取原文
           

摘要

We studied the evolution of relativistic electrons in the Fanaroff-Riley type I (FR I) galaxy 3C 449, by observing with the VLA at three frequencies (330, 1445, and 4835 MHz) and in all four configurations for a primary resolution of 36. The conventional model for this type of source is that the relativistic electrons are accelerated in the core and subsequently lose energy as the jet flows outward, expands, and bends downstream. We find that 3C 449 is more complicated than that, with evidence for a different type of structure, more reminiscent of higher luminosity FR II galaxies. We introduce a new analysis tool—the spectral tomography gallery—and find evidence for two spectral components that we label the "flat jet" and the "sheath." The flat jet remains fairly well collimated throughout the inner 5', with the sheath accounting for most of the observed widening. The flat jet shows little steepening with distance from the core. However, the sheath has a steeper spectral index than the jet. If the same spectral shape is appropriate for both components, there may be an evolutionary connection between the particles in the flat jet and those in the sheath. Another possibility is that the sheath has a steeper injection index than the flat jet. This may mean that the sheath and flat jet are separate electron populations. In either case, the standard aging analyses would give incorrect answers because of confusion between the separate spectral components.
机译:我们研究了Fanaroff-Riley I型(FR I)星系3C 449中相对论电子的演化,方法是使用VLA观测三个频率(330、1445和4835 MHz)以及在所有四个配置下的主分辨率为36这种类型的源的传统模型是相对论电子在核中被加速,随后随着射流向外流动,膨胀和向下游弯曲而损失能量。我们发现3C 449比这更复杂,有不同类型结构的证据,更让人联想到较高的光度FR II星系。我们引入了一种新的分析工具-光谱层析图像库-并找到了我们标记为“平面喷射”和“护套”的两个光谱成分的证据。扁平射流在整个内部5'处保持相当良好的准直度,其中鞘层占观察到的大部分变宽。平面射流与芯的距离几乎没有变陡。但是,护套的光谱指数比射流更陡。如果相同的光谱形状适用于两个组件,则平面射流中的粒子与护套中的粒子之间可能存在进化联系。另一个可能性是,护套的喷射指数比扁平射流更陡。这可能意味着护套和平面射流是独立的电子种群。无论哪种情况,由于单独的光谱成分之间的混淆,标准的老化分析都将给出错误的答案。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号