...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Research >Serum Bilirubin Binding Capacity and Free Bilirubin Concentration: A Comparison between Sephadex G-25 Filtration and Peroxidase Oxidation Techniques
【24h】

Serum Bilirubin Binding Capacity and Free Bilirubin Concentration: A Comparison between Sephadex G-25 Filtration and Peroxidase Oxidation Techniques

机译:血清胆红素结合能力和游离胆红素浓度:Sephadex G-25过滤和过氧化物酶氧化技术的比较

获取原文

摘要

Summary: In 35 neonatal sera, comparisons were made of bilirubin binding capacity determined by Sephadex gel filtration and by peroxidase oxidation techniques. The serum indirect bilirubin concentration was 11.1 ± 4.6 mg/100 ml (190 ± 79 μM/liter); the serum concentration of unbound bilirubin was 50 ± 60 μg/100 ml (0.85 ± 1.03 μM/liter) by gel filtration and 0.77 ± 0.66 μg/100 ml (0.013 ± 0.011 μM/liter) by peroxidase oxidation. Binding capacity averaged 22.9 ± 5.6 mg/100 ml (392 ± 96 μM/liter) by gel filtration and 22.1 ± 6.1 mg/100 ml (378 ± 104 μM/liter) by peroxidase oxidation. The binding capacity, expressed as moles of bilirubin bound per mole of albumin, was 0.80 mol bilirubin/mol albumin by the Sephadex method and 0.77 by the peroxidase method. Individual values for binding capacity were in close agreement (r = 0.961, P < 0.001). At saturation of the first bilirubin binding site, the unbound bilirubin concentration was 190 ± 80 μg/100 ml (3.25 ± 1.37 μM/liter) by gel filtration and 1.87 ± 0.54 μg/100 ml (0.032 ± 0.009 μM/liter) by peroxidase oxidation. There was no correlation between unbound bilirubin concentrations estimated by the two methods. The peroxidase method requires a smaller volume of serum than the Sephadex method and is more sensitive to small changes in free bilirubin concentration.Speculation: Both Sephadex gel filtration and peroxidase oxidation techniques appear capable of predicting the indirect bilirubin concentration at which the first or “tight” bilirubin binding site will be saturated, and above which free bilirubin concentration will be greatly increased. In neonatal sera, the two methods showed close agreement for individual determinations of binding capacity over a wide range of molar ratios. The lower limit for the neurotoxic concentration of unbound or “free” bilirubin is not precisely known and may vary in the face of multiple clinical factors. However, it seems likely that free bilirubin concentrations in excess of those measured at saturation of the first binding site would be potentially neurotoxic, and that bilirubin bound to secondary binding sites would be more readily dissociable.
机译:摘要:在35个新生儿血清中,比较了通过Sephadex凝胶过滤和过氧化物酶氧化技术测定的胆红素结合能力。血清间接胆红素浓度为11.1±4.6 mg / 100 ml(190±79μM/ l);凝胶过滤未结合的胆红素的血清浓度为50±60μg/ 100 ml(0.85±1.03μM/ L),过氧化物酶氧化的血清浓度为0.77±0.66μg/ 100 ml(0.013±0.011μM/ L)。凝胶过滤平均结合能力为22.9±5.6 mg / 100 ml(392±96μM/ L),过氧化物酶氧化平均结合能力为22.1±6.1 mg / 100 ml(378±104μM/ L)。用Sephadex法表示的结合能力以每摩尔白蛋白结合的胆红素摩尔数表示为0.80摩尔胆红素/摩尔白蛋白,而过氧化物酶法则为0.77摩尔。结合能力的各个值非常接近(r = 0.961,P <0.001)。在第一个胆红素结合位点饱和时,通过凝胶过滤未结合的胆红素浓度为190±80μg/ 100 ml(3.25±1.37μM/ L),过氧化物酶的未结合胆红素浓度为1.87±0.54μg/ 100 ml(0.032±0.009μM/ L)氧化。两种方法估计的未结合胆红素浓度之间没有相关性。与Sephadex方法相比,过氧化物酶方法需要的血清量较小,并且对游离胆红素浓度的细微变化更敏感。胆红素结合位点将饱和,在此之上游离胆红素浓度将大大增加。在新生儿血清中,这两种方法在大范围的摩尔比范围内对结合能力的单独测定显示出非常接近的一致性。未确切知道未结合的或“游离的”胆红素的神经毒性浓度的下限,面对多种临床因素可能会有所不同。然而,似乎超过第一个结合位点饱和时测得的游离胆红素浓度可能具有潜在的神经毒性,而与第二个结合位点结合的胆红素可能更容易分解。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号