Errors occurred in the article by Kassa et al, titled a??Risk Factors for Sleep-Related Infant Deaths in In-Home and Out-of-Home Settingsa?? published in the November 2016 issue of Pediatrics (2016;138[5]:e20161124; doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1124). There was an unintentional error in coding the variables related to infant position. To correct this error, the authors re-coded variables related to position and re-imputed the data as explained in the Methods section of original article. The re-imputation process resulted in minor changes to other variables. The authors state that the error did not change the outcomes or conclusions of the article. The published online article has been updated to reflect these changes. On page 1, in the Abstract, under Results, the text read: a??who died out-of-home were more likely to be in a stroller/car seat (adjusted odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.1a??3.4; P .001) and other locations (adjusted odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5a??2.3; P .001), and placed prone (adjusted odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.02a??1.27; P = .02. There were no differences in sleeping in an adult bed/on person, on a couch/chair, or objects in the sleep environment.a?? This should have read: a??Infants who died out-of-home were more likely to be in a stroller/car seat (adjusted odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.1a??3.4; P .001) and other locations (adjusted odds ratio, a?|
展开▼
机译：卡萨（Kassa）等人在文章中出现了错误，题为“家庭和户外环境中与睡眠有关的婴儿死亡的危险因素”？发表于2016年11月的《儿科学》（2016; 138 [5]：e20161124; doi：10.1542 / peds.2016-1124）。在编码与婴儿体位相关的变量时出现意外错误。为了纠正此错误，作者重新编码了与位置相关的变量，并按照原始文章的“方法”部分中的说明重新估算了数据。重新输入过程导致对其他变量的微小更改。作者指出，错误并没有改变文章的结果或结论。已更新的在线文章已更新，以反映这些更改。在摘要的第1页上的“结果”下，文字显示为：a ??在家中死亡的人更有可能坐在婴儿推车/汽车座椅中（调整后的优势比为2.6; 95％的置信区间为2.1a） ≤3.4; P <.001）和其他位置（调整后的优势比，1.9; 95％置信区间，1.5a≤2.3; P <.001），并放置俯卧（调整后的优势比，1.1; 95％的信心区间） ，1.02a ?? 1.27; P = .02。在成人床上/个人，沙发上/椅子上或睡眠环境中的物体上睡觉没有任何区别。在家外死亡的婴儿更有可能坐在婴儿推车/汽车座椅（调整后的优势比，为2.6; 95％置信区间，2.1a ?? 3.4; P <.001）和其他地点（调整后的优势比，一个？|
展开▼
