...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Prevention and Treatment of Tympanostomy Tube Otorrhea: A Meta-analysis
【24h】

Prevention and Treatment of Tympanostomy Tube Otorrhea: A Meta-analysis

机译:鼓室造口管耳溢的预防和治疗:荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

CONTEXT: Children with tympanostomy tubes often develop ear discharge. OBJECTIVE: Synthesize evidence about the need for water precautions (ear plugs or swimming avoidance) and effectiveness of topical versus oral antibiotic treatment of otorrhea in children with tympanostomy tubes. DATA SOURCES: Searches in Medline, the Cochrane Central Trials Registry and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Excerpta Medica Database, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. STUDY SELECTION: Abstracts and full-text articles independently screened by 2 investigators. DATA EXTRACTION: 25 articles were included. RESULTS: One randomized controlled trial (RCT) in children assigned to use ear plugs versus no precautions reported an odds ratio (OR) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.37a??1.25) for 1 episode of otorrhea. Another RCT reported an OR of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.29a??1.76) for nonswimmers versus swimmers. Network meta-analyses suggest that, relative to oral antibiotics, topical antibiotica??glucocorticoid drops were more effective: OR 5.3 (95% credible interval, 1.2a??27). The OR for antibiotic-only drops was 3.3 (95% credible interval, 0.74a??16). Overall, the topical antibiotica??glucocorticoid and antibiotic-only preparations have the highest probabilities, 0.77 and 0.22 respectively, of being the most effective therapies. LIMITATIONS: Sparse randomized evidence (2 RCTs) and high risk of bias for nonrandomized comparative studies evaluating water precautions. Otorrhea treatments include nona??US Food and Drug Administration approved, off-label, and potentially ototoxic antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: No compelling evidence of a need for water precautions exists. Cure rates are higher for topical drops than oral antibiotics.
机译:语境:鼓膜置管的儿童经常出现耳部分泌物。目的:综合证据表明需要进行水预防措施(耳塞或避免游泳)以及鼓膜置管儿童局部和口服抗生素治疗耳漏的有效性。数据来源:在Medline,Cochrane中央试验注册中心和Cochrane系统评价数据库,Excerpta Medica数据库以及护理和专职健康文献的累积索引中进行搜索。研究选择:摘要和全文文章由2名研究人员独立筛选。数据提取:包括25篇文章。结果:一项随机对照试验(RCT)在分配为使用耳塞的儿童中,未采取预防措施,报告了> 1次耳漏的比值比(OR)为0.68(95%置信区间,0.37a≤1.25)。另一项RCT报告,非游泳者与游泳者的OR为0.71(95%置信区间为0.29a≤1.76)。网络荟萃分析表明,相对于口服抗生素,局部用抗生素-糖皮质激素滴剂更有效:OR 5.3(95%可信区间,1.2a-27)。仅抗生素滴剂的OR为3.3(可信区间95%,0.74aΔ1616)。总体而言,局部抗生素,糖皮质激素和仅抗生素制剂具有最高的概率,分别是最有效的疗法,分别为0.77和0.22。局限性:评估水质预防措施的非随机比较研究的稀疏随机证据(2个RCT)和偏倚风险很高。耳漏的治疗方法包括美国食品和药物管理局批准的,非标签的和可能具有耳毒性的抗生素。结论:没有令人信服的证据表明需要采取水预防措施。外用滴剂的治愈率高于口服抗生素。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号